zedvictor4

The species soon becomes addicted to trends.

So is addiction to IT a mental illness?

It not you're just cherry picking mental illnesses, relative to your own mentally acquired and established likes and dislikes.

Socio-psychological evolution.

Changes that are happening.

To deny is to bury ones head in the sand.

Sexual fantasy is internal physiology,

And therefore both are modifiable,

Just as we have very quickly become addicted to information technology.

Weapons is big business.

Ultimate fantasy gaming.

I don't need to figure out what's missing.

Because realistically everything is missing, from beginning to end.

Hence cosmological scenarios.

To that end, I offered three very basic scenarios.

And you proffer a less basic scenario, but a nonetheless hypothetical scenario.

Which may or may not be more or less relative in one of my basic scenarios.

And words are words, and serve a purpose.

Like to "spin" is to go out for a leisurely drive in ones car.

So are you saying that all matter goes for a leisurely drive.

Of course not.

Just as I make no references to football players.

Once you've seen one castle you've seen them all.

I'm not particularly sentimental about history and piles of stone.

But I wouldn't want to spoil it for those that are.

I do get a certain something from remoteness and solitude.

Though I am fully aware that this all boils down to body chemistry.

Visited the South West a few years ago, it sure is different to Wales.

I've changed my mind.

Could I have a dominatrix looking festive please.

Did you stop,

For a drink,

And a bite to eat,

And all the other requirements that modern life necessitates.

Hunt the thimble,

Was always good fun.

Though you could always substitute the thimble with something a little more up to date. 

Like a small thing,

That is thimble sized.

Yep.

Time nor space need to start.

All that is required is the existence of something, to provide event and duration.

Could be matter, Mr GODDO or a cheeseburger.

All basically the same.

So Mr GODDO is a cheeseburger.

But can you tell me from where it came.

An eternally existent cheeseburger GOD is as profound a concept as nothing at all is.

Did Giuliani also get his hair dye from Russia?

Everything is real within the context of everything.

Begorrah.

Polygamy is. Multiple sex partners.

And marriage is a load of tosh really, though we have made a sociological mountain out of procreation for quite a while.

And slippery slopes are more or less slippery relative to both, slopiness and slipperiness.

And Mrs Zed wasn't keen to move to Florida. Too many alligators.

But if Mrs Sadolite would like to move to Wales. Mostly sheep here.

Cosmological infers cosmological and scenario infers a scenario.

Other than that we can only make predictions based upon what we know as of December 2022.

Though if the Universe were to end tomorrow I don't suppose anyone would will have made such an inference yesterday.

I have basic thoughts/ideas, which look at three possibilities pertaining to cosmological outcomes.

1. The automatic regeneration and reactivation of matter.

2. The inspired (GOD principle) regeneration and reactivation of matter. So, GOD principle not necessarily creative, but regenerative.

3. Or a final universal collapse where matter is reduced to an inert state.

That's three very basic cosmological scenarios that most people should be able to grasp.

But what about a primary cosmological scenario?

Now there's a thought.

I'll see what Mrs Zed thinks.

Probably farted.

Well the Church of England is worth approximately £9 billion.

And the still go around with the begging bowl.

Fix your own f****** roof!

Alas, me too. X

Debussy appreciable.

Bouncy about man not so.

Human thinks and comes up with the idea of creating a bouncy stage and bouncing around upon said bouncy stage, whilst Claude Debussy's musical composition

is simultaneously being converted into an appreciable noise.

Not sure if that constitutes logical common sense, or just ego.

Concepts all.

Nonetheless, eternally regenerative universe is a scenario that I have been proposing for a long while.

Though I always question whether the system or sequence, is reliant on something more than just universal decline, material re-initiation and material evolution. 

Something more, or GOD principle as I refer to it.

But not actually a floaty about magical bloke.

Which is not to say that floaty about magical bloke couldn't be a metaphor for GOD principle.

My bafflement is with the functionality of living organisms. and their interaction with an assumed environment.

We sense and we assume an accurate interpretation of what might be outside. (Simulation)

Which given our ability to interact with the outside world is a reasonable assumption.

And as you say, most will never question their temporary interaction with the universe.

Will you marry me.

At least we transfered data.

Which we analysed and responded to.

#2 was a direct repose to the subject of cosmological scenarios.

And we developed corresponding data from there-on.

And I would suggest that experiencing and living in someone else's mind, is a wholly self induced internal experience, that in other circumstances might be regarded as spiritual.

I find the whole concept of existence and reality quite baffling.

The cosmos that we experience is actually an internal simulation, derived and converted from external light sources.

False Ebuc.

Think about it.

When you listen to others, you re-interpret sound waves via you auditory receptors.

Or if you read someone's writings, you convert light waves via you optical receptors.

Therefore everything that you experience has to be re-created within yourself.

And so, every reaction to a sensory experience is also created within yourself.

Presumably GODDO invented period pain.

Or not.

Perhaps it's an evolved side effect of female fecundity.

A bit like gizz stains in your underpants.

As I stated it's all relative to humans and human language and vocabulary.

So make up a word and convert it to sound waves or a visible narrative.

How about henkilo.

Extra terrestrials might whistle or gurgle.

Interestingly though, the word comes from the Latin for an actors mask. So you might be on to something.

A person is an individual human.

Though the diversity of language and vocabulary and the potential for varying definition and interpretation means that we can argue the toss over personhood at length.

Nonetheless, most of what you cite refers to the function and processes of a person's onboard computer.

Which for sure, is one big difference between a living person and a dead person.

Though you might argue that a dead person is not a person but a defunct blob of organic goo.

Such is the potential of language and vocabulary.

This topic is human driven, by two sets of opposing data.

Neither set is right and neither set is wrong.

And unless we can get a GOD to put in an appearance we will never know.

Though I suspect that a GOD would probably say whatever and be far more concerned about the mess we've made of his lovely creation.

I'm sure that you will.

But do you notice from that comment, you are well and truly imprisoned within your own mind.

A.N.T.E.I.W.Y..........Always nice to exchange ideas with you.

Data transfer by the medium of information technology.

Regards

Zed.

A cosmological scenario could be Pink Unicorn people selling ice cream on the planet Blarg.

F for fantasy.

EbuccubE.......K for keep up the good work.

As I said.

No one is right and no one is wrong.

Depends upon the complexity of the joining and the viability of the twin.

Biologists make up a tiny percentage of the population and are free to say whatever they wish.

I personally refer to zygotes as zygotes and to human beings as human beings.

The difference being the developmental state of the mass and the independence of the mass.

Zygotes could also be referred to as a developing mass with the potential to become a human being. 

Relative to conditioning, abortion is a more or less emotive subject.

And relative to conditioning, we apply our own data constructs and collective data constructs to the subject, all of which are subjective.

No one is right and no one is wrong, because there is no greater authority to judge.

So, we must abide by our collective laws until such times when laws might change.

And if we find that our individual needs are unfulfilled, we must continue to lobby for change in respect of our own emotions.

I would suggest that everything is true within its own context.

Comparatively speaking we can dispute anything.

Though some things are obviously more clear-cut than others.

As for things, transgenderism clearly is one, but is clearly not clear-cut in terms of factual data. As yet.

I currently see transgenderism as a modern socio-psychological development, and a separate issue to previously well documented developmental anomalies.

Though evidence shows us how it can and will affect human physiology.

And evolution shows us how small changes will eventually result in long term species modification.

Maybe this was always in GODDO's plan.

Some propose downloading consciousness to a device.

But seems like a prison transfer to me.

Though by then, mine will have shut down and it's housing will have been recycled. 

Yep, quite correct.

J was the son of Mary and a smooth-talking Semite not named Joe.

Clearly J took after his real dad.

He's still smooth-talking people into doing silly things, some two thousand years after his death.

Apparently, it was smooth-talking that got him into trouble and brought about his early demise.

Well, that's how I interpret things.

Well, therein lies a separate discussion.

In so much as I'm not certain if dystopia is antonymous with utopia.

So for sure, I would not describe the human social world as utopic.

But neither would I say that losing an election will result in a dystopic society.

One might expect disappointment.

But when the losing group refuses to accept defeat and attempts to incite civil unrest.

Then one could then perhaps rightly envisage a dystopic outcome.

As for putting up signs saying trespassers will be shot.

Well, I have no knowledge of Federal or State trespass laws.

Though I am aware of the U.S.A 's dystopic gun laws.

But therein lies a separate discussion.

Let's be honest.

If they had stayed at home, sleepy Joe would have become President.

As it was, sleepy Joe became President.

There's a certain futility embedded in there somewhere.

And what the heck "Gotcha Mr. Authority apologist" means I do not know.

And I suspect that all rape victims would rather have been at home.

Though I doubt that most if not all rape victims did not set out to cause civil unrest for no good reason other than the ramblings of a mad miffed Orange Man.

And authority is a necessity of State.

Otherwise, there would be no authority.

And all sorts of people will do all sorts of things for no good reason other than having the freedom to do whatever they can think of next.

And wouldn't that be fun.

Reality is as good a guess as it gets.

Though we can only experience that which we assume is reality from within.

And values, observations and denial and all.

Are nothing more that electro-chemical data, sent to self.

Absolutely amazing 

It's true though.

Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.

Dumbass thought that Trump was the Orange God.

Where or what is the land of force?

Whose behaviour have I excused.

And freedom is a hot potato.

Earwax is essential.

Too much isn't.

Everything is thought.

Even everything that might not be thought, is thought.

Cosmological scenarios are nothing more than thoughts.

Therefore, everything that is contained within, is applicable only to everything that is contained within.

There is currently no way of escaping our internal prison.

EbuccubE................. May you always find contentment within.

Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.

Dumbass thought that Trump was the Orange God.

With his sidekick, boot polish head man.

For sure everything is determined by brain.

Even everything that might not be determined by brain, has to be determined by brain.

And for sure also, purpose and value or value and purpose, necessitate the same internal scrutiny.

Worthlessness and evil also.

In fact, everything is a seemingly instantaneous assumption.

Even your own assumption of yourself.

True.

As a data processing exercise, we can find a way of attributing purpose to all things.

Though I was initially referring to a Universal outcome.

Questioning if material evolution has any greater purpose, other than material evolution.

Stuff is terminatable.

Even Orange Clowns.

And then there was the old guy in the parking lot with boot polish on his head.

Amazing times.

When's the film coming out.

I propose Robert Duvall for the role of boot polish head man.

Do you think that everything has a purpose, or not?

If you see purpose, then all material development is likely to be consistent with that purpose

If you see no purpose, then nothing that you refer to above actually matters.

In terms of data input, data assessment and the formulation of data for output, everything is relative. (Understanding)

So, if you mention Murphy's Law in our discourse, I will respond.

In this case, questioning if A.I. is likely to be subject to Murphy's Law, when making comparative assessments relative to cosmological scenarios.

And Murphy's Law basically defines pessimism, and vice versa. An inbuilt expectancy that things will go wrong, rather than an inbuilt expectancy that things will go as planned.

So, I questioned if A.I. was likely to be consistently optimistic in its approach to cosmological/evolutionary progress, relative to how intellect affects material development and therefore how intellect might also affect cosmological scenarios.

Also, neither Murphy's Law, pessimism nor optimism have any relevance to the prospect of eternity, other than as intellectual data assessment concerning the prospect of eternity.

Whereby collectively, cosmological scenarios are not determined by what will be, but by what we think might be. 

And all thought is relative to the device, whether that be organic or other.

Further, fear of the unknown is a human condition consistent with the principle of Murphy's Law.

Wherein we will predict pessimistically, relative to our fear of the unknown.

All of which comes under the relative umbrella of electro-chemical data management.

I was addressing Murphy's Law relative to possible future cosmological developments, in which A.I. might play a key role.

Pessimism might or might not be a human failing, so A.I. might be the necessary next evolutionary/cosmological phase, in terms of intellectual development.

Whereby fear of the unknown does not stymie progress.

Like putting money on the collection plate or giving a tenth of your crops away to fat bishops and portly priests.

All in the name of J, his Dad, the other one and salvation. Hallelujah.

And of course, convert and you're still dishing out to the old virgin and associated child molesters.

A travelling show.

Bang on Deb

In your own distinctive way.

I expect there was also a hairy woman and a dwarf.

And an apostle on stilts.