zedvictor4

Nope, it's about a new age of sexual realism, juxtaposed with the new age of gender equality.

Wherein the old theo-mysogynistic shackles have been removed from a society.

So, conditioned people do still get hung up on Religious bunkum, though not coveting their neighbours Ox, nor his/her wife's Ass is now more likely to be regarded as over-bunkum.

Making  it OK for either him or her to covet the Filipina Nannies Ass...As it were.

Marriage these days is all about the big knees up...Sign here on the dotted line...Party time.

And coveting must be an old Christian synonym for masturbation.

Of course Doc, some people get more hung up more than others.

Top of the morning to ya.

Inappropriate use of a euphemism.

I'll have to give Darth a shout.

May the force be with you.

And don't forget the "a" in paedophile.

Nope, the letter "a" Shila.

Not the carnal proclivity.

You kids have a one track mind.

Yep a curious bunch are the muthafukas.

They could just as easily make an honest living.

Though as I always say...If there's a niche, someone will always fill it.

Reminds me of Hermit Crabs.

I think that if I was a President, I would legalise all drugs and make them either free or cheaply available over the pharmacy counter , and just leave stupid addicts to self destruct.

I expect that the clever muthafuckas would then fight over the illegal rehabilitation business.

Thanks for blowing my trumpet.

I'm not supple enough these days to blow my own.

Based upon my conditioning, If I attempt to imagine the biblical GOD, my default image is a West Coast rock star in glowing white raiments, who just hangs around looking cool.

I've never seen the movie. 

I've never been an avid Cinema goer.

And since the advent of the internet, I watch very little TV these days.

Neither am I into celebrity culture.

But a persons success and wealth relative to their chosen career is a consequence of human nature and capitalism. So good luck to them.

Firstly, I do not believe anything that I do not know for certain. ( And therefore I do not need to believe).

And I have no clue as to the origins of the Universe or life upon Planet Earth.

And furthermore, neither do you or the lovely Trade.

And I'm guessing that neither did those naive Middle Easterners who started all this now popular religious hypothesising. 

But like you and Trade, I can only speculate upon what actually went down a few thousand years ago.

So an Interventionist Super-Intelligence is a non-believing guess in respect of a GOD scenario, wherein I also guess that said entity would be a tad more logical and practical than the magic bloke as described in biblical mythology.

What I do know is...If there was/is a GOD/ISI, it clearly hasn't hung around to boss me about. Therefore I cannot obey the unobeyable.

That's good to know.

So it's thorough, and not through.

Or perhaps it should be couldn't rather than could.

My suggestion is, enjoy the beach and recover from that bout of BK induced sickness.

And resume moderation duties when you feel better.

May the force be with you.

But we know from their honest profile that BK is actually a female Muslim from Afghanistan, where the age of consent is 3.

Perhaps we should use our discretion, especially as she is expecting her 15th child, and debate art is her only connection with the outside World.

Is this helpful?

LOL.

Hey, ten grand cash or two Oreo cookies.

Tough call.

I wonder how many cookies ten grand cash would buy?

Kid wasn't thinking straight.

Out of the same hole.

MMA is just fucktards punching and kicking the shit out of each other.

Let them get on with it.

It's nice to watch the girls, but I think that they should be made to where delicate lingerie and strap on dicks...What say you sadolite?

Perhaps not the fat ones.

Just trying to be unwoke, you understand.

And the Bible isn't a cobbled together just-so-story.

And in terms of universal and evolutionary law, one could say that everything is, according to that design.

And a magic bloke with a drawing board is not a necessary requirement.

When's our next gig.

IT will be great to meet sadolite and his six pack.

You up for it ebuc?

And the guy can't even spell thorough.

Not a good start.

Hey.

Is it witch hunt season again.

It comes around from time to time.

Well, my hypothetical GOD is simply an interventionist super-intelligence, that seeks out suitable planets and sows the seeds of life.

It then departs, expecting life, species and intellect to evolve in accordance with universal laws.

It doesn't need to hang around and boss things about.

Neither does it need to leave messages.

The development of religions would have been an expectation, as intellectual organisms sought answers to questions.

And the obvious first answer, would have been an intellectual organism.

Of course we've moved on considerably since then,  in terms of intelligence gathering, material development and universal knowledge.

But some  humans like to cling on to old outdated ideas... Which was to be expected.

So in a Universe where a super-intelligence might exist, both orders and obeyance are irrelevant.

Well in terms of a hypothetical GOD scenario, in my imagination an interventionist super-intelligence would know what to expect from emerging life-forms. 

It would watch from afar and not intervene.

At this moment in time, it would be observing  that although we are still hung up on Middle Eastern religious stuff, we are nonetheless progressing nicely with technology, AI and space exploration.

Obeyance, means evolution in accordance with universal laws of material development. Same rules would apply to GOD.

So, how do you fund your lifestyle?

Love.

An specific electro-chemical response to a specific stimulus.

But we pretend it's more than that.

They would realise the difference and make up their own noises.

Or a business woman.

You will find that most folk have to do things for money.

It's sort of how it works.

Don't obey what Trade?

What is it that we do, that an omniscient GOD would not have expected?

Ah.

You just need to find a happy hooker who considers her work to be an essential social service.

A sort of sexual therapist.

It will be a buy-out.

Have you contacted that hooker yet?

You're hogging the limelight.

I can't see my six pack.

I think that Shila has a beautiful mind.

I hope he washed it . 

Who wants cheesy mushrooms?

Hinduism.

Same old shit really.

Just splashing about in the Ganges amidst the flotsam and jetsam of the funeral pyres.

Maybe there's a reason for muthafukas.

Yep, and if parents were taught to be responsible and social governments had a cohesive social strategy of inclusiveness and equality. Then it's less likely that neither dirty old men nor little Daisy would occur. 

Doesn't work like that though.

Never has.

We make a song and dance, buy that's all it is, a brief song and dance.

And then move on.

For sure.

Though the argument is all about dirty old men and little kiddies, and the perversity of  the human races evolved inhibitions and associated anxieties.

So if a dirty old man fucks a sixteen year old, the level of anxiety would be no less than if he fucked a 15 year old.

Though if a sixteen year old fucked a 15 year old no one would really care.

So the dirty old man plays games with a 9 year old,  boom lynch mob time. 

But in who's head exists the acquired perversity.

And anyway, does anyone have a choice?

Doesn't everything that occurs now, depend upon everything that occurred previously.

Ok...So society pretends to abhor a woman fucking a minor...That's equality for you.

If back in the day my history teacher had asked me back to hers for some private tuition, I would have been a fucking hero.

And existed in a constant state of premature ejaculation.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Yep.

I used the name Sonofcharl back in the day.

Oh. And goodbye.

Though if you signed up in 6 months time, on a rainy day, just for an hours catch up....Would the Earth cease to rotate?

Children acquire more knowledge than and adult ever can.

Which isn't to say that we weren't all children at some point.

Nonetheless food fads are an acquired trait relative to social circumstance and conditioning.

Which is why witchetty grubs are an Aussie Aboriginal delicacy, and the impoverished deep south prefer chicken gizzards, and the social elite delight in the consumption of snotty bivalves.

And sexuality is a state of being and is self taught...Though adults like to think that they have been taught better.

Hmmm...Cheese and pickle sandwich and a packet of potato crisps please.

Debate.org.

Fun times.

I don't remember sadolite though.

Different user name perhaps?

For sure, an intellectually developed social system is what it is and what it has become.

And if little Daisy chooses a salad sandwich, then should an appropriate adult decide that she should have ham instead.

Because little Daisy is not mature enough to understand the socio-economic impact that vegetarianism has on livestock farmers.

Of course all this stems from the ridiculous inability of an intellectual species  to come to terms with it's reproductive systems and apparatus.

A better example of clever stupid there never was.

Though as Ernest would say...Masturbation is the answer to all our ongoing sexual needs.

Think little Daisy...Wank...Have a cup of coffee...Aaaaaaand relax. BK.

If we don't understand the "problem" by now, then do you think we ever will?

Actually is there really a problem?

Human beings behave and interact just as they have always done...Selfishly.

Though through selfishness we are still able to achieve a collective intellectual and material state of progress.

I would suggest that in this respect, the existence of the individual is a universal nanosecond of either irrelevance or significance.

And banks, wealth and the associated quality of an individuals monetary and social status, is just a necessary facet of a planetary based evolutionary system.

On the other hand, if everything that we achieve here on planet Earth has no greater universal significance, then what's the "problem" if everything that we do is absolutely pointless.

Nope, the generational  transfer of Christian data has stood the test of a few thousand years.

Prior to the book, there were millions of years of other versions of stood time testing.

Being stupidly clever is a prime example.

And we didn't stop being cleverly stupid once the book had been compiled...Far from it.

Hmmmm

I cannot see a necessary connection between lax gun laws and freedom.

And from the safety of her ivory tower, Mrs Le Guin comments upon the stupidity of a turbulent, violence based 20th century.

In fact can you give me an example of a century of peace?

The 21st hasn't started very well.

The inanimate weapon will harm no one, but animate fools will.

And the biggest perpetrators of violence are not gangsters, but good ole everyday folk with a stupid agenda.

Well, said rare events, though not the daily norm, are nonetheless not rare...(Depends upon how one chooses to define the word "rare", I suppose.)

And in the context of the USA, how do you control guns?

Simply passing laws, cannot suddenly bring under control a roughly estimated 500million firearms.

And "crime" is symptomatic of a society, so I would suggest that "gun control" is unlikely to affect criminal activity, either for better or worse.

But will simply compel the gun lobby to commission spurious studies, which result in skewed conclusions.

And I'm not sure what the the UK's approach to cyber crime has to do with US gun laws.

But fortunately the UK populace is not armed, save for highly regulated sporting guns.

Though for sure, if inconsiderate people see profit in selling guns to criminals, they will attempt to do so...Such careless greed is symptomatic of a selfish species. 

And of course, everyone who transcends social laws, becomes a criminal...Such is the flimsy distinction between criminals and non-criminals. All of which combine to make up the populace.

Trouble is, with no way of verifying content, the very nature of it's development and construction, makes the Bible an unreliable source of information.

 Making your statement somewhat contradictory.

Nonetheless,, if one does not need to provide definitive verification, then based upon your conclusion, one could place ones faith in any historical myth and consider it to be reliable.

I would therefore suggest that moral righteousness , is a variable human concept, but with a shared commonality, relative to an evolving intellectual species.

In the absence of knowledge, the need for a transcendental solution was clearly a necessity.

Where will one find the definitive book of moral righteousness?

And for sure BK makes sense...But not always sensibly.

But actually, where is the definitive book of all that is sensible?

Gangs exist in most deprived urban centres.

And weapons exist because humans are not only clever, but also stupid.

And Americans are no more or less clever or stupid than anyone else.

And responsible gun owners are only responsible until such times as they are irresponsible.

And give their kids toys so that they can go play with their classmates.

And the massive US problem is the massive US problem, that the US massively created, and didn't just occur overnight.

Y'all to blame, not just the gangsters.

Not sure how completely illiterally literate any of this is.

Or any of that.

Putin is paranoid.

It comes with the territory.

I suppose so.

In so much as the notion of intelligence is a construct thereof.

Perhaps AI will give it another name.

The plan has it's upsides then?

Hi Shila.

Well, my knowledge on the subject is limited.

I put together thoughts, derived from things that I read, and developments that arise as a result.

With hindsight, human experience tells us that we will always exceed expectation....So who knows what will be achieved in the future.

For sure.

But isn't an armed populace defending against invasion, essentially a standing army?

And don't modern armed forces, need some sort of federal organisation?

Would you want nukes in the hands of a raggle-taggle bunch of gun toting, beer swilling hill billies?