Instigator / Pro
51
1481
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#1115

Artem Shypulya impeachment vs inauguration 🇩🇪

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
15
27
Better sources
18
18
Better legibility
9
9
Better conduct
9
9

After 9 votes and with 12 points ahead, the winner is...

Wylted
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
3,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
63
1387
rating
34
debates
22.06%
won
Description

No information

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

both ff half of the debate, that's poor conduct!

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro argued that Zelensky does not have adequate experience do be president. Con's counter that Zelensky was a lawyer is weak, but sufficient to rebut Pro's argument. Arguments to Con. All other points are tied.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

This has to go to con unfortunately; pros main argument is that a comedian should not be president as he has no political experience. Con points out that Lincoln and Reagan were actors and were good presidents, and Zelensky is a trained lawyer and has interest in local politics. These cast significantly doubt on the resolution and in the absence of a clear rebuttal should stand.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con points out the guy in question is not just an actor but also a lawyer, giving him insight into the legal problems of the job he is undertaking (or trying to undertake), and of course that it hasn't stopped success before. They seem agreed on the evidence, and logically showed that the evidence favors him.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

rfd in comments

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

It was a tie. Also need to get my votes up.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

No extensive dialogue took place.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Agreed Tie

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Seems like and agreed tie to me. If wrong then both technically FF'd so...