I Was Right! White People Have Been Officialy Labelled As Domestic Terrorists

1641

rating

debates

65.08%

won

Description

~ 579 / 5,000

As the title states, white supremacy has been "Officially" listed as "The Greatest Threat To America" by the Dept. of Homeland Security. News Broke a few days ago about the group of people who are committing the most crimes in the US, and it's not a surprise because white people (in general) are criminal minded to the highest degree. The individuals who I've debated in the past are looking like complete & utter fools right about now because I was 100% correct. If anyone objects to this well-known topic of proof, then you're more than welcome to argue your lack of position.

Round 1

09.28.19 06:36AM

Pro

Well, there really isn't too much to say because the proof in the pudding. As I've stated and proved on numerous occasions that white people (in general) are domestics terrorists because they commit the most crime from petty theft to full-fledged mass murder. It's quite ridiculous for anyone to try and prove otherwise because we all can see what's happening in real-time. We all can see who's the common denominator when it comes to this topic.

As I've stated in past debates, the government isn't a trusted entity/organization because the government was founded by bigots. It's quite ironic that the same government that has (falsely) labeled other groups as criminal organizations, "i.e. the Black Panthers," is the same government that's now labelling itself as domestic terrorists. I guess Homeland Security finally decided to do the right thing for a change.

I just love proving my points with cold-hard facts and rock-solid evidence. Trying to blame white-domestic terrorism on mental illness is so pathetic and redundant at this point, and everyone can see through the blatant lies. The government/law enforcement is majority Caucasian, and it doesn't want to seek out and prosecute white people for their crimes. I can literally go on and on for days, but the proof is playing out right before the world's eyes.

This debate is more so of an "I Told You So" moment...At this point in time, white people are the face of everything that's wrong in American society. You're the face of the MeToo Movement/Scam, the face of the LGBT Nonsense and the face of Domestic Terrorism.

I'm just stating the obvious so don't get mad at me for what white people are doing.

09.30.19 06:36AM

Con

Forfeited

Round 2

09.30.19 06:59AM

Pro

And another one bites the dust.

09.30.19 02:38PM

Con

You thought

My opponent obviously has the burden of proof. He must prove that white people have been OFFICIALLY labeled as terrorists. To do that, sources must be shown indicating this official status. The description is not counted as evidence. Just saying that it happened is also not enough, an actual source must be given to show that it happened. Since no sources were given, this means that Pro has not met his burden of proof. This ipso facto means that Con wins.

Round 3

10.01.19 01:17AM

Pro

Nice try, but the burden of proof is already proven thanks to all of the recent mass murders that have been perpetrated by white people. You may want to speak with Homeland Security since they added white people to the list.

10.01.19 11:49AM

Con

White people could commit multiple genocides and that still wouldn't meet the burden of proof. This is not that they're terrorists, it's of they were OFFICIALLY labeled as terrorists. No sources have been given for that (again, the debate description doesn't count). And YOU have to talk to Homeland Security, because YOU have the burden of proof, not me. Until you PROVE the resolution, Con wins.

Round 4

10.03.19 11:49AM

Pro

Forfeited

10.03.19 08:12PM

Con

Evidence must be given to prove an official status. None was given, meaning Con wins ipso facto.

Added: 3 years ago

#94

--> @mairj23

Those numbers are pretty high. The average income in Zimbabwe per day is $4. To buy a loaf of bread, it is 17.5% of your entire daily work.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-zimbabwe-bread/zimbabwe-nearly-doubles-bread-price-as-economic-woes-mount-idUSKCN1RS13X
Bet they wish whitey would come back and feed them lol.

Added: 3 years ago

#93

--> @mairj23

WOW YOUR STUNNING LACK OF EVIDENCE HAS ME SHOOK 🤯🤯🤯

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#92

--> @PressF4Respect

Your boy's mind is clearly shook after I made the "retrograde comment" earlier.

All I ask at this point is to let him lay in his casket peacefully. Lol...….figuratively not literally.

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#91

--> @bmdrocks21

So, what you're saying is that a loaf of bread costs $30, a pint of milk cost $20 and a snickers bar costs $67?

Am I correct?

Added: 3 years ago

#90

--> @mairj23

oh wow no response...

Added: 3 years ago

#89

--> @mairj23

Hundreds of million dollars can buy food.....unless you're in Zimbabwe and hyperinflation made your money worthless.

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#88

--> @bmdrocks21

You seem to not have any idea that you're setting yourself up for an embarrassing ending because the more you retrograde back, the closure you'll get to the answer. Lol

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#87

--> @bmdrocks21

I guess hundreds of millions of dollars can't buy food. Hmmm

Where did the supplement and institution of tax money come from?...I'll wait

Added: 3 years ago

#86

--> @mairj23

Those tobacco crops don't feed families, now do they?

Added: 3 years ago

#85

--> @mairj23

Taxes?

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#84

--> @bmdrocks21

I'm going to simply flame you with one basic question.

You said that the Irish built the Eerie Canal, railroads yada yada yada.....but....

where did the government get the money from to build it?...…..I'll Wait??????????? Lol

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#83

--> @bmdrocks21

Despite the fact that the US put sanctions on Zimbabwe for deporting the white racists, tobacco sales topped $730 million US dollars in 2018 and $507 US dollars in 2019...
I'm sure you feel pretty stupid right about now. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-08/22/c_138329541.htm

While in Europe, there are countries with people still walking on all fours. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140716151122.htm

Dr.Franklin

Added: 3 years ago

#82

--> @mairj23

Hahaha...I hear ya...…..but one more strike & it's a wrap.

lie

Added: 3 years ago

#81

--> @mairj23

“Who founded and made up the overall majority of White Supremacist groups?”
White Supremacists

Added: 3 years ago

#80

--> @mairj23

Well Africans still can't farm. Kinda why the Breadbasket of Africa, Rhodesia, ended up becoming starving Zimbabwe. Oops.

Added: 3 years ago

#79

--> @mairj23

Irish built the Eerie Canal, rail roads, New Basin Canal, 150,000 fought in the Union Army. The Empire State building. Contributed a lot more than certain other groups....

https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/the-hands-that-built-america-93287044-237694541
https://www.irishamericanmom.com/us-infrastructure-and-the-extraordinary-legacy-of-irish-american-immigrants/

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#78

--> @bmdrocks21

Population control is a wrap. I've given documented facts in which U can't debunk.

And what did the Irish/Italians actually build? Slaves built railroads, dug drainage ditches built the White House etc but I'm sure you knew that. Hey, Einstein...factories were in the North which were used to turn the cotton & other cash crops into actual products. The South didn't want to share the wealth which led to the Civil War...but I'm sure U knew that...
The first White settlements failed because they didn't even know how to farm i.e. Roanoke. Lol
Those Moorish castles in Europe? Africans ...Britain's wealth? Slavery...………...Please study before debating me....Ok?

Added: 3 years ago

#77

--> @mairj23

I'll just ignore the fact that you have dropped every point you have made thus far about population control.

Mainly the Irish and Italians built America, at least most lasting infrastructure. I don't know if toiling in fields "built" America, but correct me if I am wrong. Generally slave labor holds countries back because of a lack of innovation. That is why the South only had one factory at the onset of the Civil War. So, if anything, they held America back.

Africans definitely did not build Europe. Until recently, white people have been a super majority of most European countries.

How are predominately white countries in Africa?

billbatard

Added: 3 years ago

#76

i want to point out that i recieved a 7 day ban in face book for blaming wite people for terrisim

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#75

--> @Dr.Franklin

Hahaha...I hear ya...…..but one more strike & it's a wrap.

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#74

--> @bmdrocks21

Now that's funny. Who built America & Europe? Ooops

If you didn't know, Eastern Europe is war-torn & America's Fiat currency is not backed by hard assets which is why predominately white countries are in Africa...

I'll say it again...Please Step Your Game Up When Challenging Me.

Added: 3 years ago

#73

--> @mairj23

Thanks for the grammar tip :D

White people all think the same, eh? Is that why we are all such hard workers? :)
European countries(a predominately white continent) and America(a majority white country) are some of the richest countries in the world. Africa on the other hand....

Dr.Franklin

Added: 3 years ago

#72

--> @mairj23

I was banned for different reasons

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#71

--> @PressF4Respect

Who founded and make up the overall majority of white supremacist groups?

I'll wait...…………...

Added: 3 years ago

Instigator

#70

--> @bmdrocks21

Probably so; I tend to misspell words on occasions. If you did your due diligence then you'd already know that Sanger was Republican but political parties are irrelevant because you all think/act the same.

And always make sure to use a hyphen between two words that describes a subject i.e., Ugandan(-)racist group

OoDart

Added: 3 years ago

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better spelling and grammar

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Pro provides no evidence suggesting that white people have been OFFICIALLY labeled as domestic terrorists, although he provides evidence saying there are white people who do crimes. Unfortunately for pro, that is not the resolution. Con points this out, and pro never counteracts that. Con gets the argument points.

Pro also seemed to just hate white people and he was extremely toxic. Conduct to con.

Trent0405

Added: 3 years ago

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better spelling and grammar

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

BoP-- Pro looks to anecdotal cases to prove the BoP is on Con, as Con points out this is faulty, the BoP is on P+ro because he must prove White people have officially been labeled domestic terrorists. BoP on Pro.

SP=CON MJ=PRO

MJ's whole case revolves around white people being violent, not that they've OFFICIALLY been labeled domestic terrorists, so even if MJ's main point is true, he loses as a result of him failing to that white people have OFFICIALLY been labeled domestic terrorists. MJ didn't meet his BoP.