Instigator / Pro
6
1377
rating
62
debates
25.81%
won
Topic
#1460

We Should not trust GMO. Even if there is no Study saying they are harmful

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
27
Better sources
2
18
Better legibility
1
9
Better conduct
3
7

After 9 votes and with 55 points ahead, the winner is...

MisterChris
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
61
1762
rating
45
debates
88.89%
won
Description

Pro Give good reason not to trust GMO

Con Give good reason to trust GMO

I am pro

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

C ⠀

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concessiononononononon

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

concession

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

I'm going to count R3 as a concession (otherwise it's lack of relevance to this debate would make it effectively a forfeit, reducing the debate to an FF).

Pro,
Sorry to hear about your car trouble.
Also sometimes on arguments less is more, and sometimes less is not enough. Your smoking is safe point, was a great hook to bait us in, but there was no follow through on it. Other points which are likely only interesting to you, you expanded badly into the realm of Gish Gallops (that 200 types of plants are turned into oil can be stated as such, no one benefits from the list of them).

Con,
Nice explanation on why the fear of changes to oil are unfounded and miscategorized.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

concession