Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 10 votes and with 56 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Number of rounds
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
Combat Sports - A fighting style in which physical contact done to your opponent is the main objective (MMA, Boxing, Judo, etc.)
Children - People under the age of 18
Competing - Participating in tournaments or competitions
Should children be allowed to take part in these potentially dangerous sports, or do the benefits outweigh the risks?
Uh... can you still post an argument even though you're banned?
What do I do?
I don't want to forfeit this, so I'll let's just say the first round is a free one, if you can hear me that is...
Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports, because they're fragile
My opponent seemed to forfeit all the rounds...
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✔ ✗ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:the squid done did
True, although I'm really busy this week, so I might hold off debating for a while...
Easy argument for you to win this...
R2: "Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports, because they're fragile."
And again, nothing prevents you from opening a new debate on this topic to seek a real opponent.
did you forget foot ball? arent milenials pussified enough?