Instigator / Pro
67
1566
rating
29
debates
56.9%
won
Topic
#1648
Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports
Status
Finished
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 10 votes and 56 points ahead, the winner is ...
DynamicSquid
Parameters
More details
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Category
- People
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Four points
- Rating mode
- Rated
- Characters per argument
- 3,500
Contender / Con
11
1472
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Description
~ 342
/
5,000
Combat Sports - A fighting style in which physical contact done to your opponent is the main objective (MMA, Boxing, Judo, etc.)
Children - People under the age of 18
Competing - Participating in tournaments or competitions
Should children be allowed to take part in these potentially dangerous sports, or do the benefits outweigh the risks?
Round 1
Uh... can you still post an argument even though you're banned?
What do I do?
I don't want to forfeit this, so I'll let's just say the first round is a free one, if you can hear me that is...
Forfeited
Round 2
Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports, because they're fragile
- Ragnar
Forfeited
Round 3
My opponent seemed to forfeit all the rounds...
Forfeited
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✔ ✗ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:the squid done did
True, although I'm really busy this week, so I might hold off debating for a while...
Easy argument for you to win this...
R2: "Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports, because they're fragile."
R3: "Extend."
And again, nothing prevents you from opening a new debate on this topic to seek a real opponent.
did you forget foot ball? arent milenials pussified enough?