Instigator / Pro
67
1566
rating
29
debates
56.9%
won
Topic
#1648
Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 10 votes and with 56 points ahead, the winner is...
DynamicSquid
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 3,500
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
11
1472
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Description
Combat Sports - A fighting style in which physical contact done to your opponent is the main objective (MMA, Boxing, Judo, etc.)
Children - People under the age of 18
Competing - Participating in tournaments or competitions
Should children be allowed to take part in these potentially dangerous sports, or do the benefits outweigh the risks?
Round 1
Uh... can you still post an argument even though you're banned?
What do I do?
I don't want to forfeit this, so I'll let's just say the first round is a free one, if you can hear me that is...
Forfeited
Round 2
Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports, because they're fragile
- Ragnar
Forfeited
Round 3
My opponent seemed to forfeit all the rounds...
Forfeited
Criterion Pro Tie Con Points
Better arguments ✔ ✗ ✗ 3 points
Better sources ✔ ✗ ✗ 2 points
Better spelling and grammar ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Better conduct ✔ ✗ ✗ 1 point
Reason:the squid done did
True, although I'm really busy this week, so I might hold off debating for a while...
Easy argument for you to win this...
R2: "Children should be preventing from competing in combat sports, because they're fragile."
R3: "Extend."
And again, nothing prevents you from opening a new debate on this topic to seek a real opponent.
did you forget foot ball? arent milenials pussified enough?