Incels aren’t bad people. The mainstream media has portrayed them as bad people.
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 3 votes and 21 points ahead, the winner is ...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Four points
- Rating mode
- Characters per argument
- Required rating
Rules of engagement are simple and as follows:
- Round one will consist of opening arguments. Rounds 2 and 3 are for rebuttal and development. Final round is for closing statements, and no new points should be introduced.
-This debate intends to challenge the definition of incel, so no specific definition will be put in place as reference. Both Pro and Con will loosely use the Wikipedia page of incels to gauge their own definitions, as long as it is not grossly inaccurate (which will be determined through voting phase). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incel
- Failure to comply with these rules results in loss of a conduct point.
Pro did everything thus he deserves everything. Con did nothing thus he deserves nothing.
Generally awful people, but full forfeit.