Instigator / Pro
21
1543
rating
8
debates
75.0%
won
Topic
#1845

Incels aren’t bad people. The mainstream media has portrayed them as bad people.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
9
0
Better sources
6
0
Better legibility
3
0
Better conduct
3
0

After 3 votes and with 21 points ahead, the winner is...

Exile
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1476
rating
4
debates
25.0%
won
Description

Rules of engagement are simple and as follows:

- Round one will consist of opening arguments. Rounds 2 and 3 are for rebuttal and development. Final round is for closing statements, and no new points should be introduced.

-This debate intends to challenge the definition of incel, so no specific definition will be put in place as reference. Both Pro and Con will loosely use the Wikipedia page of incels to gauge their own definitions, as long as it is not grossly inaccurate (which will be determined through voting phase). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incel

- Failure to comply with these rules results in loss of a conduct point.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro did everything thus he deserves everything. Con did nothing thus he deserves nothing.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full Forfeit.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Generally awful people, but full forfeit.