Instigator / Pro
5
1360
rating
19
debates
0.0%
won
Topic

Devin Nunes

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
12
Sources points
2
8
Spelling and grammar points
3
4
Conduct points
0
4

With 4 votes and 23 points ahead, the winner is ...

oromagi
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Politics
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Contender / Con
28
1924
rating
97
debates
98.97%
won
Description
~ 33 / 5,000

God's gift to the civil courtroom

Round 1
Pro
Forfeited
Con
Thanks, ramdatt!

THBT: DEVIN NUNES is GOD's GIFT to the CIVIL COURTROOM

PRO has forfeited the opening round, forcing CON to define the term of this debate

DEFINITIONS:

DEVIN NUNES is the U.S. Representative for California's 22nd congressional district, Trump stooge, and ranking minority-party member of the House Intelligence Committee during the 2019 impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump while corruptly failing to disclose his presence in some of the meetings and on some of the  phone calls under investigation. 

GOD is "conceived of as the supreme being, creator deity, and principal object of faith.  God is usually conceived as being omniscient (all-knowing), omnipotent (all-powerful), omnipresent (all-present) and as having an eternal and necessary existence.  God is most often held to be incorporeal (immaterial).
In agnosticism, the existence of God is deemed unknown or unknowable.  Many notable philosophers have developed arguments for and against the existence of God"

GIFT is "something given to another voluntarily, without charge"

CIVIL COURT is "court dealing with cases in civil law"


BURDEN of PROOF:

Wikipedia advises:

"When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo."

CON interprets the resolution to mean that PRO must prove that God has voluntarily offered Nunes to some civil court

ARG 1.1  PRO MUST PROVE GOD EXITS

ARG 1.2  PRO MUST CREDIBLY ESTABLISH KNOWLEDGE/INSIGHT INTO GOD's INTENTIONS REGARDING NUNES and SOME CIVIL COURT(S) SOMEWHERE

CONCLUSION

Since CON expects that PRO will be unwilling or unable to prove GOD, PRO's thesis must fail

CON looks forward to PRO's R2 reply

SOURCES

Round 2
Pro
Devin Nunes is really a child who needs attention from his mommy.

Too bad he has become a burden on society.
Con
THBT: DEVIN NUNES is GOD's GIFT to the CIVIL COURTROOM

PRO has forfeited the opening round

ARG 1.1  PRO MUST PROVE GOD EXITS

  • PRO has made no reply

ARG 1.2  PRO MUST CREDIBLY ESTABLISH KNOWLEDGE/INSIGHT INTO GOD's INTENTIONS REGARDING NUNES and SOME CIVIL COURT(S) SOMEWHERE

  • PRO has made no reply
COUNTER 2.1

  • Devin Nunes is really a child who needs attention from his mommy
  • Too bad he has become a burden on society.
    • Is there anything less useful in an emergency than a corrupt politician?

CONCLUSION

  • PRO has failed to prove that God has voluntarily offered Nunes to some civil court
VOTING

  • PRO barely engaged in this debate, offered no organized argument, no sources, insufficient spelling and grammar to judge and bad conduct by forfeit
  • CON would like to thank ramdatt for the GIFT
  • Thanks to all VOTERS for their kind consideration
SOURCES