Plants vs Zombies 1 is not better than Plants vs Zombies 2
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 6 votes and with 26 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two weeks
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Six months
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
PvZ is not better than the sequel.
I need a fan to accept.
PRO did not provide sources.
PRO provided 1 sentence arguments that CON refuted easily.
Arguments: One sentence answers.
Sources: Zero sources from Pro vs some sources from Con
This debate came down to Con outlining several issues with pvz 2 while Pro either agreed or replied with his own opinions. Basically, both sides should've looked more into objective sources, if Con and Pro give me 2 opinions that conflict I can't side with one over another unless one can appeal to the opinion of gamers as a whole. This locks down several contentions, basically making them tied. But, Pro conceding the graphical point and the point about legacy really turn the tides against him. Moreover, he never properly refuted con's points about the monetary burden of pvz 2. He seemed to appeal to his opinion rather than the totality of gamers, some of whom spent money on the game when they may not have needed to in pvz 1.
The Instigator only provided single-sentence points, and gave no sources.
Con provided more in-depth arguments while Pro just listed a few things in single sentences.
Con used a few sources as opposed to Pro’s none.
Pro did not make an argument differentiating the true benefits of 2 over 1. Pro pointed out some grievances with 1 over 2, but did not compare and contrast. Pro just sat in rebuttal mode, and through their rebuttals. Pro also agreed with Con on two occasions in round 2. It is not a full concession, however it is demonstrative of the persuasiveness of Cons arguments.
Con used sound logic in pre-emotively negating the quality of graphics challenges, and that led directly to some of the concessions.
The narrative was not as organized as it could have been. Overall Con has it.
I meant for. Typo. A person's tolerance for repetition.
I meant for not or.
Pvz1 to Pvz2 is Mario Kart 7 to Mario Kart Tour. Good enough analogy.
I'll always appreciate some humor.
I think next time my girlfriend is over, I'll introduce her to these games.