1488
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#2037
Artificial Intelligence on balance is biased against African Americans
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 9 votes and with 53 points ahead, the winner is...
oromagi
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 7,500
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
1922
rating
117
debates
97.44%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
As this is a full forfeit, I have liberty to highlight a superlative argument by Con that transcends this debate while making the best argument in the four rounds. Round three's argument takes the debate to the high ground of relevance. Well done, oromagi.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full Forfeit.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full forfeiture.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full Forfeit.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
FF .
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
FULL FORFEIT
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full Forfeit
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
full forfeit
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:
Full Forfeit.
=>"When I debated someone who was a likely alt, even while I liked the quality I put in, I deleted it when they failed to rise above suspicion."
oh, you are a better man than I then. I would definitely have kept that one.
Erik is someone who made it their mission to troll every debate in the challenge period, then started creating obvious alt accounts to continue this when restricted from accepting debates. I trust your intelligence to know he was active at the time. That you were harmed by the few minutes to recreate your debate rather than given a free win, sucks, but it still doesn't relate well to this debate.
If low effort wins are your concern, you have three from the original Erik account. You even got called out for farming him, but those debates remain in place.
As for if I'm corrupt... When I debated someone who was a likely alt, even while I liked the quality I put in, I deleted it when they failed to rise above suspicion.
that has nothing to do with it. I didn't know before I created my debate that ErikT would accept it. Checkmate and you are being corrupt but there is no doubt that Oromagi will always be favoured by corruption.
It may also seem relevant that truthbomb personally challenged me to this debate. He created an earlier public version which I commented on but did not accept.
No, I did not.
Did you know prior to accepting this debate that Truthbomb would be banned?
No it isn't. Oromagi displays complete knowledge in Round 1 that it's a banned user he's debating against.
That's also an apple to oranges comparison. Just look at the dates involved.
EricT, EricTbiggestfan, EricT2, Eric were all rather obviously the same person, with the alts deleted the same day they were created.
Nothing is preventing you from recreating any debates for topics you wish to argue.
In Round 1 he posts the ban, meaning even before posting Round 1 he knew.
My debate was accepted by an alt of ErikT and you deleted it. Where's the foreknowledge there?
That is an apple to oranges comparison. This is a single debate, accepted presumably without knowledge that it would end in full forfeiture.
I did however delete all Truthbomb debates which were in the challenge period, to prevent free win farming.
You should delete this debate, I had 14 wins denied to me by bsh1 deleting me debating type1 alts.
Are machines inputted of racist information or they will develop so on their own actions?