Instigator / Pro
4
1417
rating
158
debates
32.59%
won
Topic
#2629

The information that Wikipedia provides is overall more reliable than information provided by Fox News

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
0
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
2
2

After 2 votes and with 10 points ahead, the winner is...

Athias
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
5,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
14
1598
rating
20
debates
65.0%
won
Description

The more precise version of Oromagi’s debate. Is it still winnable? Will Fruit Inspector destroy me?

Reliable means trustworthy.

-->
@fauxlaw

Thanks for voting.

-->
@seldiora

Once I'm done with my Blitzkrieg, I'll see.

-->
@Theweakeredge

wanna try voting? It's not really philosophy, but it's pretty logical.

*bump*

-->
@seldiora

"I guess the premise is too difficult to prove as is. I need a more stringent topic to win my side."

Yeah, you do. Reliability is far too abstract. Without outlining the exact metric on which you choose to make the comparison, the substantiation of your position becomes that more difficult.

-->
@Athias

I guess the premise is too difficult to prove as is. I need a more stringent topic to win my side.

-->
@seldiora

What did you think?

-->
@seldiora

I know. And I'll make sure to highlight that distinction.

-->
@Athias

thanks. Hopefully, you won't be able to trash me in Fruit's argument that wiki is not a reliable source of information at all, relative to research. Providing information is subtly different from being a source of information.

-->
@seldiora

Good argument. I'll address the argument some time later tonight, or some time later tomorrow.