Scientists Should Experiment More With Consciousness and Spirituality in Quantum Physics
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 17 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
I saw Undefeatable's debate and how he was unwilling to do Con side. Well, I'm a man of science and anti-spirituality. Let's see how one of our newest members does!
Also don't make me argue against Undefeatable, he is too strong ;.;
Burden of proof is on Con.
I will waive round 1 and Con may not have new arguments last round (may have conclusions)
A weird one since con is the instigator and declared himself to have BoP... However, as he was the only one who tried to take part in the debate, I cannot in good conscience vote against him.
Conduct for forfeiture (this debate also qualifies as a full forfeiture).
Pro had no argument while Con did. Pro did not provide any sources, while Con did. S/G tied because grammar was comprehensible. Conduct to Con because Pro forfeited.
GG for pro. No sources, arguments, no knowledge of the subject, and not a single grammatically correct sentence.
Args: there are no args. Tie.
Sources: Con defined using a source, Pro did not
S&G: Readable, tie
Conduct: Pro forfeited 2/4 rounds and made nothing clear whatsoever, to con.
This would be an excellent topic if it didn't have the word consciousness in it.
Someone hacked my account, they were probably a kid trying to make me lose XD. They wanted to paste something but it must've not worked and he pasted his schoolwork instead.
At least there's something to attack
to be fair, he's always followed his philosophy. He never forfeits, he always has at least 2~3 arguments, and he usually uses like a dozen sources to support his ideas.
Undefeatable ain't looking so bad now huh lol
"What is quantum science"
A good starting point for a debate, isn't it XD
Interesting strategy
dude, why are you even accepting this debate? You could have just defined "Quantum science" since Con didn't define it, then use it to your advantage.