Instigator / Con
28
1502
rating
40
debates
36.25%
won
Topic
#2785

Scientists Should Experiment More With Consciousness and Spirituality in Quantum Physics

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
12
6
Better sources
8
2
Better legibility
4
3
Better conduct
4
0

After 4 votes and with 17 points ahead, the winner is...

gugigor
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
11
1471
rating
3
debates
0.0%
won
Description

I saw Undefeatable's debate and how he was unwilling to do Con side. Well, I'm a man of science and anti-spirituality. Let's see how one of our newest members does!

Also don't make me argue against Undefeatable, he is too strong ;.;

Burden of proof is on Con.

I will waive round 1 and Con may not have new arguments last round (may have conclusions)

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

A weird one since con is the instigator and declared himself to have BoP... However, as he was the only one who tried to take part in the debate, I cannot in good conscience vote against him.

Conduct for forfeiture (this debate also qualifies as a full forfeiture).

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro had no argument while Con did. Pro did not provide any sources, while Con did. S/G tied because grammar was comprehensible. Conduct to Con because Pro forfeited.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

GG for pro. No sources, arguments, no knowledge of the subject, and not a single grammatically correct sentence.

Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Args: there are no args. Tie.
Sources: Con defined using a source, Pro did not
S&G: Readable, tie
Conduct: Pro forfeited 2/4 rounds and made nothing clear whatsoever, to con.