Instigator / Pro
2
1480
rating
2
debates
0.0%
won
Topic

Liberalism is inherent with Socialism

Status
Finished

All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.

Arguments points
0
3
Sources points
0
2
Spelling and grammar points
1
0
Conduct points
1
1

With 1 vote and 4 points ahead, the winner is ...

Intelligence_06
Parameters
More details
Publication date
Last update date
Category
Politics
Time for argument
Two days
Voting system
Open voting
Voting period
One month
Point system
Four points
Rating mode
Rated
Characters per argument
10,000
Required rating
1
Contender / Con
6
1660
rating
65
debates
73.85%
won
Description
~ 53 / 5,000

this is the first debate i came up with so that's fun

Added:
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better spelling and grammar
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

The outcome can be summarized with a single quote from con:
"A source and I can pretty muchagree that Stalin-era Soviet Russia is socialist[2], since Communismis a variation of socialism[3]. If you wanna critique these twoexamples, please use sources to do so, as Pro holds the BoP bydefault."

That said, I did find con to be quite eloquent, and look forward to reading more of their debates in future.

Sources:
Con used sources on Stalin, to show how bad one branch of socialism is, and support that it is void of liberalism. Pro failed to engaged with this, or otherwise offer counter sources to disprove the connection.

Legibility:
Sadly for con, the copy/paste from LibreOffice deleted many spaces, making his case unduly difficult to readinmanyplaces.