Pro Should Give Up This Debate
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 5 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Number of rounds
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
You know the rules. You wouldn't get this from any other guy.
Pro should give up this debate because it's unrated.
Pro refuses to do what he should because he's an arrogant fool.
You know the rules and so do I.
Also you lost the game.
What rules? Wtf?
happy late April Fools
Pro refuses to do what he should, thus justifying the resolution being true and his refusal to do so.
Con has failed to assert why 'should' equates to 'shall' or 'will'.
As pro has not given up this debate despite its absurdity, he clearly agrees with Con. Vote for me.
As Con has not established a justifiable link between 'should' and 'shall' or 'will', Pro wins this debate.
I don't even look at if debates are rated or not. However, if you want to revise your vote, just say the word and I'll pull the current one down.
>>RM, you're right, of course. I am too used to Con not being the initiator, and was doubly thrown by your personal reference in a third -person syntax. I'll ask Ragnar if I can revise the vote. It may not be necessary, but I'll watch for about a week. Ragnar, please take note. Being an unrated debate, does that ever figure in to making voting correction?
I called myself an arrogant fool.
Thank you for this vote btw, you saved me from an unfair loss.
You are really a troll sometimes
To me this really seems like a comedic riddle debate, therefore not moderated.
There is no way that theweakeredge's vote is valid RFD
That pro never will, is not indicative of what he should do.
You have 5000 characters, not 500.
I have literally won you on this topic as Con. You literally have free arguments.