All debates
Total debates: 3,913
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
The evidentialist model is used by Christians and Atheists alike to prove their respective beliefs, however - unlike Christians - Atheists are unjustified in their use of it. Both Christians and Atheist presuppose the existence of transcendentals, and I am arguing that belief in a God is necessary for justifying truth claims. Come debate me.
Should Humans Be Subject To The Moral Commands Of A Universal Creator? Or Is There Another Meta-Ethical Theory That Would Be Better EVEN IF God Exists?
Semantics are NOT allowed to win the debate. I do not have to prove a literal interpretation of the term scumminess to win.
This was actually a forum topic by AdaptableRatman, I’m turning this into a debate because I believe there is room for argumentation on both sides.
No description has been provided
This is specifically for MALL because I saw his arguments and was amazed, I would really like to have a chance to debate with him as I’m new and would like a challenge. Debate information is in full description
Title says it all
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
A lot of resources are directed towards exploring space while not giving the right attention to earth exploration and survival.
Hot debates
Nothing here