Instigator / Con
0
1500
rating
13
debates
42.31%
won
Topic
#3351

Scientific Racism

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
0
Better sources
0
0
Better legibility
0
0
Better conduct
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
2
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
0
1530
rating
6
debates
66.67%
won
Description

So-called race realists claim that intelligence testing, national prosperity, and historical developments prove the inequality of races.

In this debate, my opponent must play devil's advocate and put forward evidence for each of these 3 arguments so that I can dismantle them.

They may provide other arguments if they so desire.

-->
@Puachu

Alright.

-->
@Thoth

You are free to use additional arguments. I just need you to use AT LEAST the 3 I mentioned.

Your description for this debate, if interpreted literally, effectively restricts the evidence I may present to that pertaining to at least one of, and only, three aspects of supposed demonstrations of racial inequality: intelligence testing, national prosperity, and historical developments. I am willing to operate within those confines if you demand so, but I think it is unfair to decide for your opponent which categories of evidence they may and may not invoke.

"Science proves the inequality of races."

Or,

"Intelligence testing, national prosperity (e.g. GDP), and historical developments prove the inequality of races."

Feel free to add other arguments.

-->
@Puachu

State the resolution in one clear scentence