Instigator / Pro
25
1636
rating
33
debates
93.94%
won
Topic
#3926

Resolved: On balance, the death penalty in the US does more harm than good.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
12
0
Better sources
8
6
Better legibility
4
3
Better conduct
1
3

After 4 votes and with 13 points ahead, the winner is...

AustinL0926
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
12
1709
rating
565
debates
68.23%
won
Description

Resolved: On balance, the death penalty in the US does more harm than good. 

 

Death penalty (from Merriam-Webster): death as a punishment given by a court of law for very serious crimes: capital punishment  

 

The burden of proof is shared. PRO must prove that the death penalty in the US does more harm than good. CON must prove that the death penalty in the US does more good than harm. 

 

Rules: 

-No Kritiks 

-No personal attacks 

-Focus only on the death penalty in the United States 

 

Structure: 

R1: Constructive arguments (no rebuttals) 

R2: Rebuttals/defense 

R3: Rebuttals/defense 

R3: Conclusion (no new arguments)

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

CON concedes.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Forfeit by CON.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession.