A job is for money
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 2
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
I believe that a job is for money. If you disagree, you are welcome to debate with me.
full forfeit
All Pro has to do was to justify the interpretation that as long a profitable and sustainable specimen of a job(for example, a banker or a CEO) exists the topic is real, and give such example. Pro did nothing, which makes me(and perhaps more) disappointed slightly, yea.
Me giving personal arguments while not affecting the turnout of the voting distribution should amount to nothing, yeah, the debate itself is set in stone. Nobody can help Pro write his part, except maybe if I open this topic in the far future, where people forgets how fallacious their logic could be...yea.
I do believe a job is for money, leading to economical values which means having a good life. Alternatively Con has stated other types of jobs such as volunteering ( which taking into consideration of the cruel human society would only do for personal gain, but I do believe there are good people out there). However Pro failed to argue back leading to forfeiture .
Con successfully showed that some jobs (specifically ones which suck) can be volunteer driven instead of for money.
To be fair, and I can't believe I am saying this, the quality(or a lack thereof) for this topic is at a degree where the interpretation of the INDEFINITE ARTICLE would ultimately decide the position of one.
ff pls vote ty
Job is for money... unless you are a Chinese volunteer.
Tell that to Kamikaze pilots.