Instigator / Pro
7
1306
rating
216
debates
45.37%
won
Topic
#4052

Cars are harmful and should be banned before more people die

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
6
Better sources
4
4
Better legibility
2
2
Better conduct
1
2

After 2 votes and with 7 points ahead, the winner is...

Sir.Lancelot
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
14
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
Tell us how people should die due to cars.
Con
#2
Well actually, on the contrary....

My first two contentions are.:

1. Cars could save lives
If someone were to end up attacked and they dialed the police, the fastest way for them to make it would be to use a car as their means of transportation. 

And if you were also being pursued by a stranger, getting into a car could shield you and better yet help you get away.

2. Banning cars is just not feasible
Most countries are architecturally designed so that you have to use a vehicle to get anywhere. You could try walking to your intended place, but where would that get you? And remote jobs can be nearly impossible to get without the sufficient education. 
Round 2
Pro
#3
Lets kill people so that we get to our workplace faster.

Lets kill people with our cars and justify it by saying "police get somewhere faster with their cars".

Lets kill people to educate ourselves.

We should all listen to Con's mentality so that we can be rich by killing each other. There are no other forms of transport. We should justify murder. We will piss dollars and poop gold. Cars will cure cancer.

No, Con. 
Con
#4
I don't believe Pro's suggestion of resorting to murder is a reasonable solution. 

Lets kill people so that we get to our workplace faster.

Lets kill people with our cars and justify it by saying "police get somewhere faster with their cars".

Lets kill people to educate ourselves.
We should push for tighter regulation laws on who can purchase vehicles, incase people actually start thinking like this. 
Round 3
Pro
#5
Lets hope that all people accept cars as their way of justifying murder. We should place regulations so that you are only allowed to kill people sometimes.

Deae Con, cars are evil. Stop justifying them.
Con
#6
Murder is wrong, Pro. This is madness. 
Snap out of it. 



Oh, and just a note to voters, Pro used a homophobic slur in the description and is now endorsing genocide. Subtract a conduct point from him and give it to me!

Vote CON!! 😎😎😎
Round 4
Pro
#7
Cars should be our Gods. Cars should kill us all. Cars are great. Cars voted for Trump. Cars are nice to us.

Cars run us over. Wake up Con.
Con
#8
Lets kill people so that we get to our workplace faster.

Lets kill people with our cars and justify it by saying "police get somewhere faster with their cars".

Lets kill people to educate ourselves.

We should all listen to Con's mentality so that we can be rich by killing each other. There are no other forms of transport. We should justify murder. We will piss dollars and poop gold. Cars will cure cancer.
The word ‘lets’ is missing an apostrophe. Pro repeats this error several times. Pro also types ‘deae’ the last round. That’s not a word. I believe he meant *Dear. 

I believe voters should subtract a point for spelling errors from Pro too! 
Round 5
Pro
#9
Cars will cure cancer. Cars are awesome. Cars will solve world poverty. Cars will be our overlords. Cars are doctors.

No, they are not. You let your heart grow dark. This is your last chance, Con. Repent!
Con
#10
I have won this fight. 

You cannot defeat me, wizard.