Quran is not not word of god .
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
I will like to have a peaceful debate , thank you.
For what concern and what to prove god is taking swears ?
Why god needs to take swear ?
Why human do swears of god?
If god have to take swear if whom he will take?
Does creater himself have to prove that he is tell truth ?
It's a joke.
Before revealing of holy quran , allah had taken swear on quran itself (Al-Qalam 68:1).
Is it possible?
Waiting for the source that quran is a book in which the words are of allah God.
Allah takes swear of Night and Day .
God is a super intelligent being that encompasses everything. Everything is God and God is everything. He knows all and because of that we do not always have the privilege to question him. But do not be mistaken that whatever God does has logic behind it even if one does not see it.
I can only humbly assume that God meant to give an oath that the Quran was true to convince his flock that this book is true. Since the Quran was not written by God directly and by divine interpreter, God confirmed that the content inside was true by taking the oath. Remember that before the Quran was written the Arabian peninsular was divided with 360 Gods, each day was a different God. The prophet Mouhamad united the Arabians and in order to convince them that what he says is true he needed God to swear on it as one can imagine it was hard to change your religion out of nowhere after many generations. In our current day, a faithful person will dare not question the authority of God but people before being introduced the wisdom of God would have undoubtfully questioned God.
Note: I understand that English is not your second language nor is it mine. I apologize if I was unable to answer your questions or if I understood them wrong because it was a little difficult to understand what you was trying to specifically ask.
God is a super intelligent being that encompasses everything. Everything is God and God is everything. He knows all and because of that we do not always have the privilege to question him. But do not be mistaken that whatever God does has logic behind it even if one does not see it.
Since the Quran was not written by God directly and by divine interpreter, God confirmed that the content inside was true by taking the oath.
Since the Quran was not written by God directly and by divine interpreter, God confirmed that the content inside was true by taking the oath.
Absolutely terrible. Pro had the worst grammar I have ever come across, and both really never proved anything. Horrible, but had to give it to Con because he at least tried to put a mini argument together.
The Quran is obviously not the word of god. No book is because god doesn’t exist. However pro had such horrible arguments, con had equally as bad arguments. The only reason con get a vote is because his argument was at least coherent and readable, even though it’s wrong.
Neither side argued for the positions indicated by the topic, which includes “not not”.
Intelligence_06's vote it fine. It's a null vote, I'm not even going to pull up the spreadsheet.
It took me a minute... So there's an annoying bit of flawed code in voting, that any unassigned points are awarded to both sides.
So Intelligence's null vote (https://www.debateart.com/debates/4123/vote-links/8571) gave 7 to both sides, since both sides received 7 it's a wash. I'd prefer it if it gave 0 to both sides, but I cannot modify the coding (the owner wants to maintain control on that, and says it'll get fixed eventually).
Mps' vote (https://www.debateart.com/debates/4123/vote-links/8576) creates the 1 point difference, via giving S&G to only one side
When removing votes, I only reference the difference (the tied points are not even considered to be cast for purposes of moderation).
Dude, how is it fair to award points to the instigator? If you think my vote was null, and you removed it, why does the Contender need to get punished for it? If this is the case, people could go around sabotaging debates.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Americandebater24 // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 3 to pro.
>Reason for Decision: "As an atheist, who values logic and reason over faith and thus lacks a belief in Allah and Gods in general, I have to side with the Pro."
>Reason for Mod Action:
Any awarded point(s) must be based on the content presented inside the debate rounds. Content from the comment section, other votes, forums, your personal experience, etcetera, is ineligible for point allotments.
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#based-on-outside-content
**************************************************
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: M.H.S // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 5 to con.
>Reason for Decision: "Contender's arguments alone should be the reason he wins."
>Reason for Mod Action:
In essence, this vote was just too vague... This can be avoided in future by just commenting on the core contention (and the main counterpoint or the lack thereof), listing a single source you found important (if voting sources), saying what conduct violation distracted you (if voting conduct)... You need not write a thesis, but some minimal level of detail is required to verify knowledge of what you're grading.
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#casting-votes
**************************************************
And because this "spelling error", it changes everything.
It was not "not not". This was a spelling error by the instigator.
"Contender had a much better argument."
That is not valid reason for point allotments.
Please review the voting policy before casting more votes:
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#sufficiency
@Intelligence_06
Ok next time u will do that too , thank you for feedback sir
It would be much better if you link websites of Quran passages. We, as secular people don't know it as well as you do.
Even though I was with the Quran ,the agressive debater won by a long shot. He caught him in a trap and quoted him contradicting himself. Slaughter
Hello , it's my first here. . thank you for accepting it will be a understanding debate thank you onces again
Your outer description is at war with the stance of the topic.
Hello, this will be fun.