Quran is not not word of god .

Intelligence_06's vote it fine. It's a null vote, I'm not even going to pull up the spreadsheet.

It took me a minute... So there's an annoying bit of flawed code in voting, that any unassigned points are awarded to both sides.

So Intelligence's null vote (https://www.debateart.com/debates/4123/vote-links/8571) gave 7 to both sides, since both sides received 7 it's a wash. I'd prefer it if it gave 0 to both sides, but I cannot modify the coding (the owner wants to maintain control on that, and says it'll get fixed eventually).

Mps' vote (https://www.debateart.com/debates/4123/vote-links/8576) creates the 1 point difference, via giving S&G to only one side

When removing votes, I only reference the difference (the tied points are not even considered to be cast for purposes of moderation).

Dude, how is it fair to award points to the instigator? If you think my vote was null, and you removed it, why does the Contender need to get punished for it? If this is the case, people could go around sabotaging debates.

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: Americandebater24 // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 3 to pro.
>Reason for Decision: "As an atheist, who values logic and reason over faith and thus lacks a belief in Allah and Gods in general, I have to side with the Pro."
>Reason for Mod Action:

Any awarded point(s) must be based on the content presented inside the debate rounds. Content from the comment section, other votes, forums, your personal experience, etcetera, is ineligible for point allotments.
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#based-on-outside-content

**************************************************

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: M.H.S // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 5 to con.
>Reason for Decision: "Contender's arguments alone should be the reason he wins."
>Reason for Mod Action:

In essence, this vote was just too vague... This can be avoided in future by just commenting on the core contention (and the main counterpoint or the lack thereof), listing a single source you found important (if voting sources), saying what conduct violation distracted you (if voting conduct)... You need not write a thesis, but some minimal level of detail is required to verify knowledge of what you're grading.
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#casting-votes
**************************************************

And because this "spelling error", it changes everything.

It was not "not not". This was a spelling error by the instigator.

"Contender had a much better argument."

That is not valid reason for point allotments.
Please review the voting policy before casting more votes:
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#sufficiency

@Intelligence_06
Ok next time u will do that too , thank you for feedback sir

It would be much better if you link websites of Quran passages. We, as secular people don't know it as well as you do.

Even though I was with the Quran ,the agressive debater won by a long shot. He caught him in a trap and quoted him contradicting himself. Slaughter

Hello , it's my first here. . thank you for accepting it will be a understanding debate thank you onces again

Your outer description is at war with the stance of the topic.

Hello, this will be fun.