Instigator / Con
7
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Topic
#4313

Islam is a peaceful religion.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Sir.Lancelot
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Pro
4
1468
rating
9
debates
38.89%
won
Description

Pro argues Islam is a peaceful religion, Con argues it isn’t.

Definitions:

Islam- The religion of the Muslims, a monotheistic faith regarded as revealed through Muhammad as the Prophet of Allah.

Peaceful- Free from war, strife, commotion, violence, or disorder.

Religion- The belief in and worship of a superhuman power or powers, especially a God or gods.

Rules:
1. BOP is on Con.
2. One forfeit is the loss of a conduct point. Two are an autoloss.
3. Definitions are not absolutes.
4. Evidence can be used from current events, Islamic culture & history, and the Quran.

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

I mean, if followers of one religion are more violent than the followers of other religions, then thats obvious proof of what such religion results in.

When people argue Islam isn't peaceful, they usually use quotes from the Koran. Personally I would use all the terrorist attacks to prove my point.

Peaceful- Free from war, strife, commotion, violence, or disorder.
what there is left to debate when u have definitions like that.

I don’t know, but to me it seems to come down to how one interprets jihad

-->
@Barney
@PREZ-HILTON

I think maybe he could change it in, islam is a violent religion?

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

I’m just trying to encourage anyone who may be on the fence to step up.
And yes, a better definition should be suggested before the debate commences.

-->
@Yassine
@Sir.Lancelot

Oh no nevermind, I would rather have @yassine take this challenge due to his fine english (mine is not that good) and his broad knowledge, I saw a few of his former debates and think he would be able to do it better than me.

Im new to all this, and was wondering why I can’t join the debat.

-->
@PREZ-HILTON

Exactly. Depending on how you define "peaceful," a lot of Muslims wouldn't classify Islam as such. Besides, I think most of them would support fighting defensive wars at the very least.

-->
@Barney

The definition of peaceful could disqualify just about any group of people as not peaceful. Nobody is "Free from war, strife, commotion, violence, or disorder."

It's looking like no one here believes the resolution to be true.

-->
@Yassine

Fixed.

What details would you prefer I add, if any?

For a topic like this, I’d say BoP rests more strongly with con. Peace is a default state we can assume until evidence of the contrary is presented.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

- The description needs more detail. & also I need more than 3 days for arguments. I am busy the next couple days, I will take this on asa I have time.

Absolute, as in if Pro has a superior definition to contest mine (more relevant to the subject.) then they may choose to do so, and it will be valid.

Definitions are rarely absolute.

So there's Muslims and then there's Muslims.

Islam is the collective noun.

definitions are not absolutes.
well, that will make this intresting.

-->
@Yassine

Fixed.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

- Full topic? Definitions? Rules?

-->
@Yassine

Interested in this one?