Instigator / Con
0
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4319

All furries are bad and i have yet to see a person prove otherwise

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
0
1

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

Bella3sp
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
1,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
1
1524
rating
53
debates
75.47%
won
Description

No information

Bump.

Look at me mommy, I am a furry.

-->
@Bella3sp
@BennyEmerald

im against furries, but the options were confusing. sorry for inconvinence

-->
@BennyEmerald

Depends. I can refer to "I" as me.

Yes, the short description does target the opposite side however the set in stone position for them is con.

"All furries are bad and i have yet to see a person prove otherwise" is what con posted. But they're posting as con, meaning their against the topic sentence. So why put "and I have yet to see a person prove otherwise"? That description targets the instigator, but the instigator is con meaning they disagree with the claim, so they're disagreeing with their own experiences?

Maybe they wanted to put pro and mixed it up, who knows.

You know what.. i'll just accept this and see how this goes.

-->
@Bella3sp

all furries are zoophiles

-->
@randomason

The definition of "bad".

-->
@Bella3sp

definitions of what

-->
@randomason

I will accept if you list the definitions.

-->
@Bella3sp

He's probably trying to pull the old Pro-Con switcheroo.

You're on the wrong side.