Instigator / Con
0
1500
rating
1
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4319
All furries are bad and i have yet to see a person prove otherwise
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
Bella3sp
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 1,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Pro
1
1524
rating
53
debates
75.47%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Con
Tie
Pro
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
CON spends their entire opening supporting PRO's position and then forfeits all the following rounds.
Bump.
Look at me mommy, I am a furry.
im against furries, but the options were confusing. sorry for inconvinence
Depends. I can refer to "I" as me.
Yes, the short description does target the opposite side however the set in stone position for them is con.
"All furries are bad and i have yet to see a person prove otherwise" is what con posted. But they're posting as con, meaning their against the topic sentence. So why put "and I have yet to see a person prove otherwise"? That description targets the instigator, but the instigator is con meaning they disagree with the claim, so they're disagreeing with their own experiences?
Maybe they wanted to put pro and mixed it up, who knows.
You know what.. i'll just accept this and see how this goes.
all furries are zoophiles
The definition of "bad".
definitions of what
I will accept if you list the definitions.
He's probably trying to pull the old Pro-Con switcheroo.
You're on the wrong side.