Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
2
debates
75.0%
won
Topic
#4364

The two genealogies for Jesus in the Bible cannot be reconciled.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
0
Better sources
0
0
Better legibility
0
0
Better conduct
0
0

After not so many votes...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1500
rating
10
debates
35.0%
won
Description

Matthew 1:1-16 and Luke 3:23-38 both purport to be the genealogy of Jesus. They have little in common besides saying that Joseph was Jesus’ father and that he descended from King David. For instance, Matthew says Jesus descended from David’s son Solomon and Luke says it was from David’s other son Nathan. There have been many attempts to reconcile these two genealogies over the centuries. I am not convinced that any of them succeeded. My opponent has agreed to try again.

I propose, subject to my opponent’s approval, to limit debate to five rounds, with the last three for rebuttals only. I will be working from the NIV and am open to using a different translation.

-->
@Lemming

Thanks for the comment.
I had the idea that a human was watching each debate. I guess not.

-->
@b9_ntt

It resulted in a tie, because no one voted,
And the system is not programmed to recognize when someone doesn't post an argument,
Even if it 'did though,
The individual who 'did post arguments,
Might be posting gibberish, for all the program would know, if it's just checking for posted or not.

It is explained in the Bible, really. Not really sure what confuses you there.

Bible clearly says "it was considered" and in other translations it says "so it was thought".

We know that "it was considered =/= it was so".

We know that "so it was thought =/= it was so.

Bible clearly explains that both genealogies were incorrect, since Jesus was Son of God. He was not son of Joseph like both of those genealogies claim.

-->
@Skipper_Sr

Done.
Anything else?

-->
@b9_ntt

Please change the Time Period for debating from one week to two weeks. I also have school work and tend to be slower with responses. I won't usually take up the entirety of the fourteen days and try to respond quickly enough