Instigator / Pro
3
1522
rating
14
debates
28.57%
won
Topic
#4415

God, as portrayed in the bible, cannot reasonably exist to the words of the bible.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

Best.Korea
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Two months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Con
7
1309
rating
271
debates
40.77%
won
Description

Personal interpretations of the bible will not be used in this debate, it will be a debate solely around what the bible says. This means that the Bible will be interpreted from a literal standpoint and not a metaphoric one. As this is regarding God's portrayal in the bible, texts outside of the bible will not be taken into account. Both the old and new testaments will count as the bible for this argument. BOP is on Pro. This debate relates to "the words of the bible" as commonly accepted in English. Con may only assert that a section of the bible cannot be used if they bear BOP to prove that the section of the bible cannot be true (such as due to a translation error), obviously ignoring the argument that it cannot be true as it contradicts other parts of the bible for the purposes of proving this. Forfeiting any rounds auto-forfeits the whole debate. My opponent auto-forfeits if they are someone I am currently debating on a similar subject (such as Mall).

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

> 40% forfeit