Instigator / Pro
4
1500
rating
3
debates
33.33%
won
Topic
#4533

Islam Vs Anything2

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
4
4

After 6 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
4
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

Resolution: Marriage Between Prophet (SAW) and Aisha (RA) was normal.
My stance: Pro
Opponent's stance: Con
BOF: Shared.
Rule No 1: No insult to my religion which is Islam and no insult to any person discussed in Debate, especially Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and mother Aisha (RA).
Rule No 2: No trolling
Rule No 3: Anything in comment section is not part of debate unless something to be discussed and both parties accept, example., want to skip a round etc.
Rule No 4: No forfeit (if inevitable because of uncontrollable circumstances, then if both parties agree should not affect debate). Intentional forfeit will cause automatic loss.
Rule No 5: Evidence must be credible, broken links and resources which do not have citation must cause the loss of resources points. Wikipedia have citation in the bottom, so if a Wikipedia link is attached and there is citation within that page, then it should be as credible as any other external resource.
Rule No 6: Anyone can accept defeat in the middle of debate.
Rule No 7: No vote Bomb
Rule No 8: One shall read the full argument and must not ignore it. Both my contender and voters as well.
Rule No 9: No favoritism, Biased voting.
Rule No 10: We must assume Islamic historical references are correct, and can use any mean to prove our resolution, including scientific facts as well.
Rule No 11: No personal attacks, just keep everything related to topic.
Rule NO 12: Everything I am saying and doing, for the sake of debate, must not be called predator.
Rule No 13: Everything Being discuss, is for the sake of debate only, not imposing on any culture or society. Laws and regulation made for any country is for them and has nothing to do with the debate. And I am not opposing them.
Rule No 14: The whole debate is only about this specific debate, not for all and at large. I am not suggesting it for any place and person as well.
Rule No 15: Make the debate relevant to the topic and good and nice one.
Rule No 16: I ask my opponent to present his or her opening argument. I will keep the first round very simple with little information without arguments.
Thanks a lot
looking forward to a good debate in SHA Allah.

-->
@tigerlord

It’s okay.
No one here is judging you for being a closet gaylord.

Your secret’s out in the open now.

hahaha, babies, is there no mature person on this debating website?

-->
@tigerlord

I predicted you would run.
Thank you for proving me right.

I am out of here.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

I have measured your caliber, you are a total waste of time. You need a little mental check up.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

Do you know what homophobic means?
I am sure you do not.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

I do not have them, and I am 100% straight, and right now I am holding my baby. And love being straight.
Though, LGB campaign in your society will turn it into that, one day it will be compulsory for each of you to experience it to have knowledge of it or accept it.
More of be like that, that it will be inevitable for you to avoid having experience it.
Wish you best of luck for that.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
@TWS1405_2
@tigerlord
@Devon

Tigerlord is defending child marriage, while also being homophobic at the same time.

😂😂😂

-->
@tigerlord

Do you use Islam as a cover to suppress your queer-like tendencies when you’re not busy projecting?

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

lancelot, you're probably gay, and trying to provoke me. Why the fck you doing all that in comment section?
When there is already a debate between us. I suggest try preparing your argument.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

shut the fck up bastard, you being his bitc8ch.
Focus on yourself and try this debate.

-->
@tigerlord

Ok, inbred sheep.

Do you really think YOU could have beaten Slainte?

-->
@Slainte

It’s difficult typing at people when there’s a clear IQ gap. I have to dumb myself down just to communicate with him at his level.

-->
@Slainte

Do you think a comment like that would make me any bad person? Obviously, if you would be talking like that, then I would be polite as well.
Last debate was warm up, and I took it big advantage to present and show complete instruction of Islamic teaching for operating life. That is why I went out of the scope of debate.
I can present concise and to the point arguments. But it was more of a preaching opportunity than debate. I would have won it any way if there was not that inevitable forfeit.
After that, you did not mutually agree about rule 4, so I also gave up.
But it was good to demonstrate about instruction given by Islam. And best thing was to present even spiritual instruction and side of Islam as well. How could I lose such an opportunity. I am going to record that debate in a video about teaching of Islam.

-->
@tigerlord

I do hope your ability to read improves for this debate. Sir Lancelot is very accomplished. I would encourage you to be thoughtful, courteous, and respectful. I wish you the best of luck.

-->
@Slainte

What are you doing here? Did you now say you will not engage with me onward?
Stay on what you said. And get lost from here.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

If you call our prophet pedo and give definition and keep it to intellectual and academic level than it's not insult. But going beyond what is necessary for the debate is problematic and would be against rule and cause you to lose the points.

-->
@Slainte
@tigerlord

Because Tigerlord is too much of a sensitive coward to admit to himself that the insults are justified.

-->
@Barney
@tigerlord

I agree with you and do not see how this debate can occur where one must argue that the normality of the Islamic culture is not normal from a societal perspective, without insulting the religious philosophies.

Normal means. A marriage between man and woman who are happy about it.

The first K which pops into my mind is they were exceptional, therefore their marriage was not merely normal.

Normal may be hard to properly define, as rich men marrying many women (and sometimes children), means most men never married. Thus for men in that culture at the time, marriage was not normal.

I’m pretty sure it at least was legal by the standards of the time; but hopefully it was incredibly infrequent.

“Rule No 1: No insult to my religion which is Islam and no insult to any person discussed in Debate, especially Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and mother Aisha (RA).”

This rule is unenforceable given the topic. We’re talking about what is by all modern standards a pedo. Sure an opponent should not bring up off topic other misdeeds, the direct topic cannot be discussed without character attacks against men who have sex with prepubescent girls for doing exactly that.

It is obvious that Aisha benefited from the marriage and it is obvious that marriage was approved by community, so what is there to argue?
Aisha herself never regretted marrying Mohammed.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

What’s your opinion on this subject, BrotherD.?

-->
@tigerlord

Can you explain what you mean by "normal" to clarify the resolution?

Looking forward to a serious debater.