Instigator / Pro
2
1500
rating
3
debates
33.33%
won
Topic
#4594

Frequent Sex Ruins A Woman's Value

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
2
6

After 6 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...

RationalMadman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
6
1702
rating
569
debates
68.1%
won
Description

I believe that frequent sex ruins a woman's value. I am on the pro side, and I hope to express my opinions on why and facts supporting my claims. Please do not join if you just wish to forfeit every round. I'm looking for an actual, serious debate.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Massive BoP failure (which con highlighted), followed by forfeiture.

The very premises pro tried to use, reminded me of the one great scene from a Uwe Boll film:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt_tv7t79WY

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Even though rational madman and I do not get along, and he has said he is quitting this website like 750 times and still keeps coming back, he obviously won this debate. It's funny how his opponent was stern about not wanting someone forfeit and only made one unthought out argument then forfeited the rest. He made a very good argument as to why value has to be earned and isn't just given, and why sex doesn't really have an effect on that value. Even though it could be argued that women who have sex with many different men lose value to some people, it is hard to argue they lose value as a whole. That would be a hard thing to prove.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Con ran pro over in this debate with a trillion reasons why orgasms are good.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

I will agree with Pro on the grounds of multiple partners devalues a woman (at least in her own mind), is unhygienic and causes depression. I also agree with Con that much sex for a woman is good, but that is not to say that all cannot be achieved with one partner. Pro's point was only made obvious at the end of her first round, multiple partners. If the debate went on it could have been defended as such, but it didn't.

So I will run this as a tie due to the lack of response from both sides and then the moot argument from Con in R2.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

"Frequent sex has proven to cause depression, is unhygienic, and at least with traditional standards is seen as shameful."

I mean, this argument alone proves the topic correct. However, Pro forfeited 2 rounds, which is 2/4 of debate and Con forfeited 1 round. So I am not sure what to do with this. I will leave it as tie.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Full Forfeit. Pro's opening argument was very weak. Con's had a great argument insofar is woman who have lots of sex certainly have value to some, which I see irrefutable, If this debate continued, and Con reiterated that concept, it was a home run.