Frequent Sex Ruins A Woman's Value
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 6 votes and with 4 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
I believe that frequent sex ruins a woman's value. I am on the pro side, and I hope to express my opinions on why and facts supporting my claims. Please do not join if you just wish to forfeit every round. I'm looking for an actual, serious debate.
Massive BoP failure (which con highlighted), followed by forfeiture.
The very premises pro tried to use, reminded me of the one great scene from a Uwe Boll film:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt_tv7t79WY
Even though rational madman and I do not get along, and he has said he is quitting this website like 750 times and still keeps coming back, he obviously won this debate. It's funny how his opponent was stern about not wanting someone forfeit and only made one unthought out argument then forfeited the rest. He made a very good argument as to why value has to be earned and isn't just given, and why sex doesn't really have an effect on that value. Even though it could be argued that women who have sex with many different men lose value to some people, it is hard to argue they lose value as a whole. That would be a hard thing to prove.
Con ran pro over in this debate with a trillion reasons why orgasms are good.
I will agree with Pro on the grounds of multiple partners devalues a woman (at least in her own mind), is unhygienic and causes depression. I also agree with Con that much sex for a woman is good, but that is not to say that all cannot be achieved with one partner. Pro's point was only made obvious at the end of her first round, multiple partners. If the debate went on it could have been defended as such, but it didn't.
So I will run this as a tie due to the lack of response from both sides and then the moot argument from Con in R2.
"Frequent sex has proven to cause depression, is unhygienic, and at least with traditional standards is seen as shameful."
I mean, this argument alone proves the topic correct. However, Pro forfeited 2 rounds, which is 2/4 of debate and Con forfeited 1 round. So I am not sure what to do with this. I will leave it as tie.
Full Forfeit. Pro's opening argument was very weak. Con's had a great argument insofar is woman who have lots of sex certainly have value to some, which I see irrefutable, If this debate continued, and Con reiterated that concept, it was a home run.
RM is pretty good at this.
Pro sounds like she needs to get laid.
I'm sorry for the vague variables this gives, but since I know this is a mature subject, I'm fine with some mature language, nothing graphic, though. Thank you for considering how to convey your responses appropriately.
It's actually very difficult to word this debate given the age bracket your profile gives you (you didn't specify the age but either way you are underage).
I am largely wondering how to word things in a way appropriate for you.
I did think he completely forfeited, so I'll keep that in mind. Thank you.
This topic is basically a truism, I think.
Frequent sex is literally the opposite of virginity.
If virginity increases woman's value the most, then frequent sex decreases woman's value.
Virginity increases woman's value the most.
Frequent sex decreases woman's value.
However, dont assume that RM has forfeited. He sometimes forfeits one round, then comes back in another.
Definitely, since this guy is just gonna forfeit evidently.
Hey. After my two debates are complete. I can join you in this debate topic. You open to it?
This is an awesome debate topic. Although it may be harder on a pro position , making the topic about having multiple sex with one partner only is interesting.
I look forward to reading this