Instigator / Pro
33
1500
rating
4
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4789
women can’t drive
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 6 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
RationalMadman
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two hours
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Contender / Con
36
1702
rating
567
debates
68.17%
won
I personally find the humor offered by con to be superior. Not that either actually made me laugh; but it’s at least amusing to see the entire (weak) basis for a case flipped to favor the opposite side.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4704-diet-battle?open_tab=votes&votes_page=1&vote_number=1
RM's vote is actually a direct violation of the CoC because it is inadequate and undermines the standards you set for the judging criteria in the description.
By your own description, it was very clearly not defined as a troll debate, so this is actually an actionable offense.
You may not care enough to report it, but it does demand urgent action if you were to DM any of the mods.
RM voted in very Bad Faith there.
Good luck blocking everyone on this website.
I'm discussing exactly what you reported. I would hate to see how you are in real life when you don't have the block button to save you.
If you want something to pay attention to, stop ignoring the people who disagree with you and instead listen. I'm not blocking you back (for now) because I don't need something to hide from others disagreements.
Unblock me or not in the future, I don't have a problem with you. And because of that, I won't block you.
Good luck on here. You are done @ing me.
When I get notified I want it to be something I need to pay attention to.
Look at the description of that debate.
Or.. did you not read it? Does it matter unrated or rated? Obviously right now you're complaining over votes when this debate is unrated.
This is no debate either. Don't go crying to the mods over the exact thing you did. I consider this a troll debate, you seemed to view the same with mine, I guess we're chill now.
Savant's vote is a tie, which also leaves it standing either way.
your unrated diet battle? What capacity can you 'win' on there? LOL
There is no debate there. There is no criteria.
Okay, and I'm introducing my opinion regardless of you inviting me. If you're forgetting, this is public comments. And my vote is involved. Otherwise, report on private messages if you want it private.
Others might take this shit from you and let it slide, but I won't. You want to vote like this on my debates, I will as well. Nothing personal.
I didn't ask you a single thing.
I disagree. You never stated it was tabula rasa, therefore as the voter I don't have to use my own knowledge.
Besides that, I can in fact, consider this a troll debate and you (feed) into it.
If you read the logic in this debate:
Being silly becomes optimal
Thus one is left to agree with Con by Pro's statement tethering Con's side to a positive attribute because of Con's rebuttal.
This is axiomatically won by Con. It is impossible to justify a vote for Pro here without explicitly violating tabula rasa.
I report all three votes.
I report both votes, I argued for my side.