Instigator / Pro
MrPotato's avatar
7
MrPotato
1492
rating
4
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4847

IQ does not determine intelligence

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
12
Better sources
2
8
Better legibility
3
4
Better conduct
2
4

After 4 votes and with 21 points ahead, the winner is...

Average_Person
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
1
Time for argument
One day
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
Average_Person's avatar
28
Average_Person
1516
rating
20
debates
87.5%
won
Description

No information

prefix's avatar
prefix
#4
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro gave no argument, and no sources
Con at least had some point made and some source used.
Pro's conduct was poor in that Pro did not engage the issue.

Barney's avatar
Barney
#3
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Technically it doesn’t, since it’s intelligence which determines the measurable IQ…

But pro had a single sentence assertion against a properly warranted case. So foregone conclusion.

RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
#2
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

interesting

Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
#1
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Eh, what? Well, Pro says that he has IQ of 300. Then says he is dumb.
Con challenges the claim by saying that someone with 300 IQ wouldnt make dumb arguments.
Con provides a source. Since Pro didnt provide source, sources go to Con. With burden of proof on Pro and Pro's arguments negated, Con wins the arguments.