Instigator / Pro
1
1500
rating
6
debates
41.67%
won
Topic
#4904

Should schools teach comprehensive sex education?

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
0

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

patrik42221
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1306
rating
216
debates
45.37%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
Introduction: The need for comprehensive sexual education in schools has become increasingly apparent. As discussions about sexual health, consent, and healthy relationships permeate society, the role of educational institutions in providing accurate and relevant information has taken center stage. By equipping students with knowledge that spans beyond the physical aspects of sexuality, schools play a vital role in fostering a generation that is well-informed, empowered, and capable of making responsible decisions concerning their sexual health and well-being.

Why would it be beneficial?

Building healthy relationships and behaviors
: Comprehensive sexuality education can help students understand the basics of healthy relationships, communication, and mutual respect. This will help to develop non-violent and equal relations in the future.

Pregnancy prevention and protection against sexually transmitted diseases: Sex education gives students the opportunity to learn about contraceptive methods and ways to prevent sexually transmitted diseases. In this way, the risk of unexpected pregnancies and diseases can be reduced.

Development of self-knowledge and body awareness: During sex education, students can get to know their own body, its changes and needs better. This can lead to positive body image and self-confidence, and help avoid possible body image disorders.

Prevention and recognition of sexual harassment: During sex education, students can learn how to recognize and act in cases of sexual harassment and abuse. This can increase the safety and protection of children.

Source of appropriate information: Students are often exposed to bad or unreliable information about sex and sexual health from their environment. Sex education at school helps counter these misconceptions and provide appropriate, scientifically based knowledge.

Social equality and respect for diversity: Comprehensive sexuality education provides opportunities for students to learn about different sexual orientations, identities and expressions. This contributes to strengthening social acceptance and equal opportunities.

Supporting parent-child communication: Sex education creates opportunities for students to talk about sex and sexual health together with their parents or guardians. This promotes open communication in the family.

Age appropriateness: During sex education at school, the curriculum is adapted to the given age and maturity level, so that students receive information appropriate to their own stage of development.

Studies and Researches

Researchers studied the National Survey of Family Growth to determine the impact ofsexuality education on youth sexual risk-taking for young people ages 15-19, and foundthat teens who received comprehensive sex education were 50 percent less likely to experience pregnancy than those who received abstinence-only education

Researcher Douglas Kirby for the National Campaign to End Teen and UnplannedPregnancy examined studies of prevention programs which had a strong experimentaldesign and used appropriate analysis. Two-thirds of the 48 comprehensive sex edprograms studied had positive effects. 40 percent delayed sexual initiation, reduced the number of sexual partners,or increased condom or contraceptive use. 30 percent reduced the frequency of sex, including a return to abstinence. 60 percent reduced unprotected sex.

According to the UNESCO: CSE is five times more likely to be successful in preventing unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections when it pays explicit attention to the topics of gender and power
Con
#2
No. 7 year olds deserve to be innocent. They shouldnt be taught these things. 7 year old is too young to be learning about sex. Age of innocence should be respected. Protection of innocence outweights all reasons you listed. 7 year olds cant consent to learn about sex. So you would be violating them.
Round 2
Pro
#3
I agree that discussions about sexual education should be age-appropriate and considerate of a child's developmental stage. My argument for comprehensive sexual education in schools does not necessarily imply that explicit sexual content should be taught to 7-year-olds. Rather, it suggests that as children grow older and enter adolescence, it's important to provide them with accurate, relevant, and responsible information about their bodies, relationships, and personal well-being.
Con
#4
Well, the topic doesnt say older or younger children. I assume you are trying to change the topic to what its not.
Also, God opposes to sexual education. He doesnt want his little angels to be polluted with filth.
Round 3
Pro
#5
 Correct the topic does not specify if it's about older or younger people. But I did talk about an age group in my researches and studies part.
Researchers studied the National Survey of Family Growth to determine the impact of sexuality education on youth sexual risk-taking for young people ages 15-19, and foundthat teens who received comprehensive sex education were 50 percent less likely to experience pregnancy than those who received abstinence-only education
I think that irrationally assuming I am talking about 7 year olds make no sense. Also Cathocalically the Church supports teaching about human sexuality within the context of marriage and family life. Would god want it's creations to suffer? By Sexual viruses like HIV or unwanted pregnancies? Making the parents have a bad relationship divorce and let the children live a bad life?
Would he oppose for people to understand how a family and reproduction works? 


Con
#6
Thank you for the debate.