Instigator / Con
4
1479
rating
318
debates
39.31%
won
Topic
#5040

There's justification for teaching homosexuality in academic schools.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Best.Korea
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Pro
7
1300
rating
221
debates
44.8%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Questions on topic, drop a comment.

Round 1
Con
#1
Greetings.

I'm going to step aside be it that the opposing side is the affirmative and present their case for justification.

I will follow up with applicable questions of course.

Now as far as justification so we're on the same page, justification is what is necessary correction.

It is an answer to address an issue or problem. A correct answer of course.

For instance, killing someone in justification is not murder by law . Someone trying to murder someone is unjustified is a problem for that someone's life being tried to be taken away.

To solve the problem, the necessary answer or justification is to self defend one's life. No more, no less. 
What is the problem? Identify it and solve it with the appropriate, necessary, correct application accordingly.

With this in mind, the opposing side may present their case of why academic schools of all places have a necessity to educate about homosexuality.

These are your middle schools, elementary schools in particular.

Alright, take it away .
Pro
#2
Homosexuality is kind, so it should be taught. The more gays, the better. Its the straight who are the problem.
Round 2
Con
#3
Can you give us a justification for homosexuality to be taught in academic schools?
Pro
#4
Justification: It will reduce violence towards homosexuals.
Round 3
Con
#5
It's like you're not catching on here.

Let me put the question this way.

Can homosexuality be taught aside from academic schools doing so ?
Pro
#6
Can homosexuality be taught aside from academic schools doing so ?
Yes.

Round 4
Con
#7
Then there's no justification in schools as homosexuality can be taught outside of schools leaving teaching it in schools as unnecessary.

Do you follow all that?
Pro
#8
A little more teaching = even better

So yeah, I am afraid that its still pretty much justified.
Round 5
Con
#9
"A little more teaching = even better

So yeah, I am afraid that its still pretty much justified."

A little more teaching outside of academic schools yes. There's is no necessity for academic schools on this. Absolutely none. You haven't built any argument that is exclusive or special to academic schools. You're definitely not even close to trying to argue in this topic.

Any point you've broached can just be applied outside or aside from academic schools.

I would like these debates to last longer comrade. Somethings are enjoyable long lasting.



Pro
#10
Well, I think gay should be everywhere, no?