Instigator / Pro
1
1500
rating
3
debates
66.67%
won
Topic
#5077

Mine's bigger

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
1
0

After 1 vote and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...

buttmaggot15
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
2,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
0
1731
rating
167
debates
73.05%
won
Description

Resolution:

Pro's penis is bigger than con's

Rules:

1. If you don't have one, then you lose.

2. It only counts as yours if it's of your flesh, attached to your body and your blood flows through it. For example, a dildo taped to your arm doesn't count.

3. No violating the code of conduct. Pertinently, "You may not post or link to pornography or other explicit adult sexual material." HOWEVER - If you can find a way to prove your case without violating the code of conduct, then by all means do so.

4. Size at the time fully erect is what matters. Flaccid and stretched flaccid length are irrelevant.

5. Preferred form of measurements are bone pressed erect length measured in inches or centimeters and girth. This is not about "longer". This is about "bigger". Total volume is therefore the most relevant.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro put forward a claim that he has a large size which would put him above most males. Naturally, this is the internet and there's no real way to prove this claim right or wrong. Con did not specify his measurements, but instead claimed that the debate violated the code of conduct. It is debatable whether Pro's statements count as "posting or linking to pornography or other explicit adult sexual material". Con could have done a better job arguing that it did, in fact, violate the code of conduct. If any images were submitted for proof, as Pro was entertaining, that would certainly be a violation, but this did not happen. Con's first round was flaccid, and shot two blanks with his double forfeit. Comparing this to the larger, longer, more solid arguments that Pro has erected and thrust forth, I feel confident handing this one off to Pro.