Thanks for accepting the debate.
We all know what circumcision is, so my argument will be simple.
1. Greatest equal options
Every person desires to have options in life.
An adult who was never circumcised can make a decision to get circumcised if he wants, if he chooses to go through that pain, or to keep his foreskin as it is.
However, a circumcised child has no such option.
Circumcised child can, at best, later in adulthood, try to regrow foreskin.
So we see that uncircumcised adult has an option to get or to not get circumcised, but circumcised child has no such options.
The choice to never get circumcised, to never go through that pain and to keep first foreskin is being taken away from the child by force, reducing the number of options he has in life.
2. Not causing more pain than you remove
Circumcision causes a lot of pain.
Circumcising more than 80% of children for some small benefits for 2% of them is a lot of unnecessary pain.
Circumcision is painful, not just during, but also for 7 days after circumcision.
"11 patients (9.8%) had severe pain at any time during recovery, including 8 with wound problems"
There are also complications during circumcision, which leave injury to the penis, sometimes permanent damage in addition to the fact that circumcision itself is permanent.
3. Countries which have very low circumcision rates are healthier
If you look at top 20 countries in life expectancy, you will see that great majority of them have very low rates of circumcision.
But if you look at 20 countries with lowest life expectancy, you will see that they have very high circumcision rates.
There doesnt seem to be any health benefits of mass circumcision.
It seems that taking away options from people harms their health.
Conclusion
We see that circumcising children takes away their choice, causes much more pain than it removes, and isnt related to better health in general.
It's just a joke LOL. It also happens to be factually accurate that the debate is about the penises of children
For better or worse, we're not overreacting so much anymore. As much as the words are gross.
Why would you tell it to me? Tell it to whiteflame. You didnt ask me, and I am not even a moderator.
I can tell you the 2 rules he is violating if you want me to go there.
You are probably just trolling for attention. You often publicly report things that are not violations.
I don't know what to say.
That is some shit you never want said on a site you moderate, I would have him begging for mercy just like he did ADOL, if I were in your shoes.
It's perhaps in poor taste, and voters are welcome to recognize that in their votes, but yes, he's "allowed" to say it.
I didn't ask you.
Yes, its allowed.
Its just a harmless joke.
Is the round 3 allowed for the site president to say?
bill gates is not famous for wearing a black polo shirt. I am pissed at myself for missing that type