Agnosticism is the most logical/rational based view on the existence of god.
Waiting for the next argument from the contender.
Round will be automatically forfeited in:
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- One week
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Questions on the topic, send a message.
Explanation of my position as it pertains to breaking down the meaning of the topic will be in round 1. No preliminary details are necessary here.
you'll notice it's a conditional statement
Soooo, the person who just got busted for illigeal drugs in my neighborhood is god.
Riiiiiight.
You should reconsider your philosophy before you start worshipping your dog.
(IFF) omniscient omnipotent creator = exist (THEN) everything that exists = omniscient omnipotent creator
And what is your definition of God?
YOU CAN ONLY BE AN AGNOSTIC IF YOU DON'T HAVE A CLEAR DEFINITION OF WHAT THE HELL A GOD IS SUPPOSED TO BE
If you want to redo this debate I will accept it.
The funny thing about agnosticism is that it is equally likely to be the position of those who think about whether God exists the least and those who think about it the most.