"Those verses do indeed show he is in heaven"
Let me try to help here because it's something technically here that you're not getting and haven't gotten so far.
When you say "he", "he" who? Was it the son of God flesh and blood who was the son of Mary?
If you say yes, you are saying flesh and blood is in heaven. Is that what you are going to admit?
"literally says they saw him go to heaven"
Right, that's correct. For the scripture say this
"same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven".
That lines up with the book of Hebrews chapter 4 since Hebrews was brought up, right.
In verse 14 it said we have a great high priest that has passed into the heavens.
According to chapter 7, still in the book of Hebrews, this priest was after the order of Melchisedec.
What was that order?
Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.
Not the son of Mary. Mary was his mother.
"Hebrews 9:24 literally says he entered heaven , john 14:2-3 literally says he is going to his father's house(obviously heaven) , now again god would have the ability to do anything he wants including going to heaven even as flesh , that rule would apply to humans sure , but not god's son/word/ god whatever you want to call it "
I believe Jesus said the hour has come for him to be glorified. In first Timothy 3:16 it said preached unto the gentiles , believed on in the world, received up into glory. Even Jesus knew he was not going to be as he was as flesh and blood going into heaven. Glorified flesh , manifested flesh goes up . But not the flesh Mary gave birth to.
The scripture teaches of rightly dividing the word of truth. You have to rightly divide all of this.
"No , divorce of a man and women was condemned , only allowed if the women cheated on her husband"
According to the scripture, that is not true. Jesus never permitted or justified divorce and putting away.
Nice opening argument. IMO you’ve reached the point that until counter biblical evidence is provided, you can just point to your existing case.