AfD is a terrible party.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 2 votes and with 1 point ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 1
- Time for argument
- Two weeks
- Max argument characters
- 1,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
Is AfD a terrible party?
Pro would have served his readers and voters to take more caution to prepare a better Description of the intended debate because I, for one, had no idea what AfD was, let alone the numerics of 9.1, 9.2, etc, [and still don't - I should not have to do that research just to vote] nor that this involved Germany until several lines into Pro's argument. This is one reason why a 1,000 character limit to a round may be challenging, but ultimately uninformative. Debate is dependent on information. Next time, give more.
Con made a good argument of definition by creating a reason to favor a judgment of "good, neutral, bad, orterrible" rather than Pro's limiting "terrible" or not.
Con wins.
This debate was far too short for any real rebuttals or multiple proofs. Not enough information.
"they are a terrible party because the liberals don't like them, like they like the traditional conservatives who kiss their ass and make no progress"