Instigator / Pro
1
1522
rating
10
debates
60.0%
won
Topic
#6096
Protestants are covertly misogynistic and outright scummy in how low and insignificant they view and treat Mary.
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 4 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
FishChaser
Judges
Barney
53 debates /
1,389 votes
Voted
whiteflame
27 debates /
212 votes
Voted
Sir.Lancelot
198 debates /
85 votes
Voted
WyIted
37 debates /
23 votes
Voted
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 8,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Judges
Contender / Con
4
1542
rating
110
debates
59.55%
won
Description
Semantics are NOT allowed to win the debate. I do not have to prove a literal interpretation of the term scumminess to win.
Mary is Her holiness and queen of Heaven Saint Mary mother of Jesus, not Saint Mary Magdalene.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro forfeited.
Would have loved to see a debate.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Con had some weak assertions, but they were topical and challenged the notion of massive sexism against Mary... And of course, pro conceded.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Non vote. No arguments made by either side. Concession rejected.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Forfeited and then conceded by Pro.
I’ll have you removed as moderator or I’ll have this entire site taken down if you don’t stop cheating!
I confess, during this debate I totally cheated! That's why neither pro nor con defeated me during it.
You only win 100% debates by cheating! You are 100% cheater
I am sorry for allowing my behavior and aggression towards you to get the better of me. I have crossed the line multiple times with my words, so it is only fair you are owed an apology.
I do respect you as a person and share your same feelings about DART being too tolerant of certain views or opinions
I have no interest in debating Sir Lancelot, I barely respect him as a user beyond voting decently (unless he is using alts in sitebannable ways) but I am owed an apology and do not care to engage with the user on any personal until that apology comes.
He actively bullied me in multiple ways. I was abused by him for many weeks and that is a fact.
The only apologies I give are that I engaged in a rap battle I shouldnt AND that I kept debating him and replying rather than ignoring.
Your frustration is perfectly justified, and I promise to debate authentically and in good faith this time.
The anesthesia debate was me being completely lazy, not taking it seriously, and using cheap tricks to defy the resolution.
I shall engage passionately with this subject and give it 100% commitment
I could do the buddhism one, with minimal semantic arguments and engaging only in actual substance. I was disappointed in your response in the anesthesia debate because I was hoping for you to disprove the information hazard. I guess if I have a soul it won't be a problem though.
AdaptableRatman is better for the other one since he is actively Catholic. I'm leaning Presbyterian again currently.
By chance, would either of you be interested in a debate about Buddhism versus Christianity or Orthodoxy vs Catholicism?
I realize Orthodoxy and Buddhism exist in separate categories, but I’ve been interested in the subject recently and was looking to debate it.