1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#6195
Men should have right over a woman's abortion
Status
Voting
The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.
Voting will end in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 1,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description
This has been a controversial topic in the recent years, sparking outrage and furor. Can men have the right to abort their baby or not? We will see. In this debate, we discuss about this particular topic.
Removal of vote of pierree by barney is not acceptable, Barney saying vote is not well defined, It is totally understandable. As per voting policy forfeiture reduces conduct point, pierree mentioned it,anyone can accept this vote except brainless Barney, A cheapest moderator, brainless idiot not considered pierree's effort and time, but barney voted by just saying forfeiture.
My vote goes to con
Reason:
Both pro and con explained their views shortly in round 2, so i consider argument of pro and con as tie, neither of the above produced sources, due to forfeiture of pro from round 1 itself also pro forfeits 50% debate so in conduct wise con is won, Also con strongly argued against pro by saying women have major role in pregnancy. considering all these factors i vote for con.
**************************************************
>Reported Vote: pierree // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 to con
>Reason for Decision: The Con was very solid with the arguments, the conduct and the Legibility and pro tried so hard to be able to beat him but pro's arguments weren't solid at all and lacks in civic common sense and respect. Case closed.
>Reason for Mod Action:
In essence, this vote was just too vague... This can be avoided in future by just commenting on the core contention (and the main counterpoint or the lack thereof), listing a single source you found important (if voting sources), saying what conduct violation distracted you (if voting conduct)... You need not write a thesis, but some minimal level of detail is required to verify knowledge of what you're grading.
This is very slightly short of borderline, so is closer to a mistake correction. Further, pro did forfeit much of the debate, so a vote based on that would not be judged.
**************************************************
I disagree <3
it's not to attack you but are you aware that all the things you wrote were misleading and unsubstantiated claims and also you forfeited two rounds even after the pro's claims, it lacks on conduct and legibility I'm sorry