Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#6195

Men should have right over a woman's abortion

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
1,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
2
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

This has been a controversial topic in the recent years, sparking outrage and furor. Can men have the right to abort their baby or not? We will see. In this debate, we discuss about this particular topic.

-->
@Barney
@whiteflame
@pierree

Removal of vote of pierree by barney is not acceptable, Barney saying vote is not well defined, It is totally understandable. As per voting policy forfeiture reduces conduct point, pierree mentioned it,anyone can accept this vote except brainless Barney, A cheapest moderator, brainless idiot not considered pierree's effort and time, but barney voted by just saying forfeiture.

-->
@whiteflame

My vote goes to con

Reason:
Both pro and con explained their views shortly in round 2, so i consider argument of pro and con as tie, neither of the above produced sources, due to forfeiture of pro from round 1 itself also pro forfeits 50% debate so in conduct wise con is won, Also con strongly argued against pro by saying women have major role in pregnancy. considering all these factors i vote for con.

-->
@pierree

**************************************************
>Reported Vote: pierree // Mod action: Removed
>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy
>Points Awarded: 1 to con
>Reason for Decision: The Con was very solid with the arguments, the conduct and the Legibility and pro tried so hard to be able to beat him but pro's arguments weren't solid at all and lacks in civic common sense and respect. Case closed.
>Reason for Mod Action:

In essence, this vote was just too vague... This can be avoided in future by just commenting on the core contention (and the main counterpoint or the lack thereof), listing a single source you found important (if voting sources), saying what conduct violation distracted you (if voting conduct)... You need not write a thesis, but some minimal level of detail is required to verify knowledge of what you're grading.

This is very slightly short of borderline, so is closer to a mistake correction. Further, pro did forfeit much of the debate, so a vote based on that would not be judged.
**************************************************

-->
@pierree

I disagree <3

-->
@Behemoth

it's not to attack you but are you aware that all the things you wrote were misleading and unsubstantiated claims and also you forfeited two rounds even after the pro's claims, it lacks on conduct and legibility I'm sorry