Instigator / Pro
10
1488
rating
11
debates
68.18%
won
Topic
#6284

Pizza is a Salad

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
12
Better sources
4
8
Better legibility
4
4
Better conduct
2
3

After 4 votes and with 17 points ahead, the winner is...

AdaptableRatman
Tags
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Rated
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Two weeks
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Minimal rating
None
Contender / Con
27
1597
rating
30
debates
65.0%
won
Description

The Debate is on if the Food Pizza is considered a salad or not

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro lost conduct point due to forfeiting 1/3 of the debate.

Con provided more reliable sources from well-established dictionaries.

Con had the better argument because he gave good points for how pizza is not a type of salad.

Comment:
One of the things I would say against Pro's argument is that the base of pizza and salad are very different as well as the preparation and methods of serving and consumption.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Argument:
Pro flailed to adequately define terms, one ofc tree essential necessities of a multiple criterion debate. Pizza and salads are keywords of the Resolution, "pizza is a salad." pizza is loosely described by Pro, but insufficient to call it a dictionary definition, and salad is more poorly described as a "mix of ingredients."
Con's RE1, first argument is effectively the winning argument up front as first salvo by repeating a Pro R1 argument, but with word emphasis [bolding] to demonstrate an excellent rebuttal: "a mixture of uncooked vegetables, usually including lettuce, eaten either as a separate dish or with other food," by an initial description of a salad, but with the closure "...eaten either as a separate dish or with other food." "other food" being, for example, a pizza, because, Con explains, pizza is not salad, and Con's balance of R1 explains why not, simply because salad can be, but is not necessarily "a mix of ingredients", since a pizza can be described exactly the same way, and yet, Pro admits "salad" is "a separate dish or with other food" which makes it a distinctive food that can be combined with pizza, but Can defines salad as "raw greens [such s lettuce," but pizza is "baked with toppings" while salad is not typically baked. pro wins argument.
Sources:
Pro offers a quoted statement in R1, but does not cite a source, so, it is not certain why the statement is in quotes. Pro offers no other apparent sources.
Con offers dictionary sources of definition in R1, the offerers more surges to recommend refrigerated storage of leftover salad, and re-heating leftover pizza [having already sourced the baking necessity of a pizza dish to serve it.] Points to Con.

Legibility: tie

Conduct: Pro forfeits round 2; Con wins point.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro is grasping at straws by arguing that some pizza could be considered salad, but then concedes that most pizza itself differentiates via being served hot... This concession feels like further discussion is wished, but that the debate itself was conceded.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro ignores all the english dictionary just by questioning this topic.
Con provides the right definitions clearly outlining the differences between pizza and salad.