Instigator / Pro
0
1500
rating
2
debates
25.0%
won
Topic
#6438

¿Qué problemática nos indica el texto propuesto y qué propuestas sugieren para resolver esta problemática?

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
12
Better sources
0
8
Better legibility
0
4
Better conduct
0
4

After 4 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...

Mharman
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
1
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
28
1421
rating
32
debates
42.19%
won
Description

No information

Round 1
Pro
#1
Forfeited
Con
#2
There are multiple ways to interpret this debate and I'm not sure which is correct, so I'll argue all of them.

1. Reference to a different debate.

This could be the same topic of a different debate my opponent had, and this is a continuation.


^^^This one.

I argue that Peru should privatize their education system because the private sector is more efficient, and different schools have a greater incentive to compete. If there's a high enough demand for inclusivity, some schools will meet it.

2. A question for me to answer.

How do I solve problems? By analyzing key details and filtering out bad solutions. One good tick is to keep asking "why"... go down the why branches and you'll get greater understanding of the problem, which helps the solution.

3. Against problem solving

Cleary this is argument against problem solving since some problems are hard. This is a motte and bailey fallacy. Arguing against solving hard problems doesn't equate to an argument against solving all problems.

Also, hard problems can be solved. 

Also, my approach to this debate is problem solving.

4. Additional arguments

I should win this debate because
1. I am awesome.
2. My opponent sucks.
3. I made arguments, while my opponent did not.

VOTE ME!