Instigator / Pro

IsmaelToledo28

1500

rating

debates

25.0%

won

Topic

#6438

¿Qué problemática nos indica el texto propuesto y qué propuestas sugieren para resolver esta problemática?

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 4 votes and with 28 points ahead, the winner is...

Mharman

Tags

Sustenta tu respuesta

Parameters

Publication date: 08.08.2025 12:03AM
Last updated date: 09.04.2025 03:47AM
Type: Standard
Number of rounds: 1
Time for argument: Two weeks
Max argument characters: 10,000
Voting period: One week
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open

Contender / Con

Mharman

1421

rating

debates

42.19%

won

Description

No information

Round 1

IsmaelToledo28

08.26.2025 05:03AM

Pro

Forfeited

Mharman

08.28.2025 03:47AM

Con

There are multiple ways to interpret this debate and I'm not sure which is correct, so I'll argue all of them.

1. Reference to a different debate.

This could be the same topic of a different debate my opponent had, and this is a continuation.

¿En nuestra realidad peruana se realiza educación inclusiva?

^^^This one.

I argue that Peru should privatize their education system because the private sector is more efficient, and different schools have a greater incentive to compete. If there's a high enough demand for inclusivity, some schools will meet it.

2. A question for me to answer.

How do I solve problems? By analyzing key details and filtering out bad solutions. One good tick is to keep asking "why"... go down the why branches and you'll get greater understanding of the problem, which helps the solution.

3. Against problem solving

Cleary this is argument against problem solving since some problems are hard. This is a motte and bailey fallacy. Arguing against solving hard problems doesn't equate to an argument against solving all problems.

Also, hard problems can be solved.

Also, my approach to this debate is problem solving.

4. Additional arguments

I should win this debate because

1. I am awesome.

2. My opponent sucks.

3. I made arguments, while my opponent did not.

VOTE ME!

Mharman

08.28.2025 04:57AM

7 day voting yet 14 day argumentation is criminal

Mharman

08.28.2025 03:48AM

-->

@Barney

@whiteflame

@Lemming

cashing in on a ff

Mharman

08.12.2025 05:10AM

🤷‍♂️ .

Barney

09.04.2025 12:16AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

f to the f

David

08.31.2025 12:19AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full forfeit

Lemming

08.28.2025 11:35PM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Forfeit by Pro.
Bit impressive in a way, how much effort Con put into the debate,
Either knowing another language or looking up translations,
Looking at opponent profile of debates.

I considered conduct hit for
"My opponent sucks." Con Round 2

But eh.

whiteflame

08.28.2025 03:53AM

Criterion

Pro

Tie

Con

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

Full forfeit