Instigator / Pro
6
1495
rating
47
debates
48.94%
won
Topic
#797

Men and women are a different type of organism from each other.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
0
1

After 1 vote and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...

Sparrow
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
Three days
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
4
1697
rating
556
debates
68.17%
won
Description

No information

Am I the only one who may or may not have misread the title?

-->
@Ramshutu

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed

>Points Awarded: 3 points to Pro for arguments, 1 point to Con for conduct

>Reason for Mod Action: The vote was found to be sufficient per the site voting policy standards.
************************************************************************

If they're different organisms, how can they fuck and make kids?

-->
@Ramshutu

good vote.

"I feel con missed the boat here by relying on obtuse and largely nonsensical semantic attacks; whilst pro added a very sensible sounding and intuitive argument about types. Con didn’t address the details of pros analysis here, or refute the key aspects of type pro raised in his first and second rounds."

Is identical to my reasoning in that debate he had vs Type1. I actually think he lost that debate.

-->
@David

Please counter shutus votebomb here.

-->
@Pinkfreud08

*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Pinkfreud08 // Mod action: Removed

>Points Awarded: 3 points to Con for arguments

>Reason for Decision: Concession

>Reason for Mod Action: As far as I can tell, no one conceded.
************************************************************************

"Technically, every kind of organism is a different type than every other organism, because type can be defined by a single difference"
Exactly, that's why I literally win just by starting this debate and having someone accept it.
"but in the context of the debate, that's not what you're implying."
Yes it is, I am arguing that since men and women are two different types of people based on their gender, they are a different type of organism as in they are organisms and belong to two different types of gender.

-->
@Sparrow

Technically, every kind of organism is a different type than every other organism, because type can be defined by a single difference. I am a "different type" of organism from every other human because I am me, but in the context of the debate, that's not what you're implying.

Organisms can be classified into gender types therefor I am winning this debate. It's elementary really.

-->
@Sparrow

One word: hermaphrodites. People can be born with both sexual organs.

"Men and women are a different type of organism from each other."
I'm sorry, but this is kind of a stupid topic for an argument. Each species is just seperated into two genders based off of the amount of X and Y chromosomes. It doesn't nessecarily mean that men and women are different organisms.

"Pro's source supports 2.1's major premise"
minor not major*****

If all rounds are as brief as Sparrow's opening argument I'll vote. However, I feel like a 30 000 character opening argument from the Madman is on its way, have fun debating this topic Sparrow

-->
@Sparrow

I am going to try and semantically out-troll this tautology. Good luck.

They are both humans but males and females are different.