All debates

No description has been provided

As a condition, if you accept this debate before 2026, then you automatically lose. If you accept the debate without reading the description, then that is your fault, not mine. There will be four rounds in total, with PRO waiving the first round.

1. I am pro Islam and want to debate with any other religion or atheism. 2. I have not decided topic yet so if my opponent agrees to my rules then we can discuss resolution in private messages. 3 No moderators are allowed to vote on this debate especially named Barney, if Barney voted on this debate then it's automatic loose for my opponent. 3 Islam is not presumed to be false and the Quran as well unless we are talking about these topics. 4 Burden of proof is always shared.

hmmm well idk it hit, so i hit it as well.

Plain and simple.

Pro is of the opinion that Marxist theory does not work, while Con is of the opinion that it does work.

I am of the opinion that white privilege is not a thing; I don’t think the American system inherently advantages whites over minorities. Con’s argument would be that white privilege does exist, and that American society does inherently advantage whites over minorities.

I am of the opinion that the whole philosophy of “when a first-world country makes itself richer, it naturally impoverishes other countries” is a stupid idea. It’s just not true. But of course, I am open to hear your side in a civilized debate…

No description has been provided

Há um ato de racismo quando um negro ofende outro negro?

I am con. Is time travel scientifically possible?