The second coming of Christ (not Jesus)

What is the problem with sanctified, incorruptible, resurrected fleshy in heaven? Thus, the angel told the crowd observing Christ's ascension to heaven, that he would return and we should see him as he ascended; ion the flesh. Christ told his disciples that as he was, so is the Father. He is a body of flesh, s well.  When Christ returns, he will once again have "the fruit if the vine" with his disciples. A spirit drinks? I don't suppose so. 

"Think it not strange, if  heaven has a care,

To justice, good, forthright and fair,

If after our Lord brings us there,

'He serves us chocolate, all seasons of the year."

A Christmas greeting card verse I wrote about 20 years ago.

A tribute to his common sense of justice applied to eating, to allow us to be with him, and to celebrate  our being there, together. What better course might we consume. Dark chocolate - 80% range,  that is; the only variety that fully satisfies by flavor intensity.

You haven’t changed much since then.

I read it and said be ready to give an answer. Being crucified and resurrected has nothing to do with flesh and blood so it is not answering the question.

When you can't answer you move the goalpost.

Even after resurrection he didn't say he was flesh and blood so you're condemned there. He was no longer the same son that was not glorified that could shed blood.

The problem is not with any of what you said. The issue is believing that the Son of Mary never came to an end.

They we have known Christ after the flesh, right now and here after know we him no more.

Correction: though we have known him.