Christchurch Terror Attack, Motives & Global Prospects

Author: Yassine

Posts

Total: 155
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Analgesic.Spectre
It's a damn shame he couldn't apply his genius in a way that didn't slaughter people who are innocent and just wanted to live their lives, at least for the most part.
What other avenue would he have had if he was being censored? I didn't read the manifesto so i have no clue, actually pretty ignorant to this whole ordeal bc i simply don't care anymore. But you and Resurgent do have a point in pushing people underground is not a good idea. 

I would argue... since i don't know him i'm going to speculate. If he wasn't someone, if he didn't have that narcissistic drive, etc... that's people that get into power mostly. The way he did it was the most brilliant way to get his message across. It's sad really... the world knows how to trigger our media and get attention. They are very predictable. And look, now they want to ban 'military style weapons.' Like that will save them or anyone for that matter... push a dog into the corner, it will bite... i've been saying that ever since the censoring began.   
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@mustardness
There was something i watched or read a long time ago where women were in control. It was hilarious bc it ended up as men being in chains and slaves to them. It was interesting i remember, in how it got there. But for the life of me i can't remember where i saw / read it. 

But, you might be right... maybe if god was a girl we would be better off too. The problem however with women in power is that they hate other women. Plus, have you ever worked for a 'bitchy' women before... i guarantee you it would be the worst job you've had. A list of the worst jobs i had were with bad women bosses or gay bosses. But then again, some of my best jobs are with cool women... bc they wanted to hook up was an added bonus :)

So who knows what would happen. Not all women are nurture, as not all men are what you say. The people that tend to get into power are generally wolves. I personally think having intellectuals that are experts in specific politics run our politics is the best move we can make... man or women, just know everything about what you doing... bc as it is... all we have are greedy lawyers, just in general greedy narcissists are running our world... of course it's going to turn out to be shit.  

Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,323
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@disgusted

But of course anyone who agrees with Nazism and Fascism is in need of serious medical intervention.
"Nazi officials saw Islam as a powerful force with the same enemies as Germany: the British Empire, the Soviet Union, and the Jews. Islam and Nazi Germany’s War is the first comprehensive account of Berlin’s remarkably ambitious attempts to build an alliance with the Islamic world".


Islam and Nazi Germany's War

Relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world

"The relationship between Nazi Germany (1933–1945) and the leadership of the Arab world encompassed contempt, propaganda, collaboration and in some instances emulation.[1] Cooperative political and military relationships were founded on shared hostilities toward common enemies, such as British and French imperialism and colonialism,[1] communism, and Zionism.[1] Another key foundation of this collaboration was the anti-semitism of the Nazis, which was admired by some Arab and Muslim leaders, most notably Hajj Amin al-Husayni (see Antisemitism in Islam). In public and private, Hitler and Himmlermade warm statements about Islam as a religion and political ideology, describing it as a more disciplined, militaristic, political, and practical form of religion than Christianity, and commending what they perceived to be Muhammad's skill in politics and military" leadership. 

Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,323
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@Yassine
- Stephen, have you ever been in a Muslim country?
Yes.


I invite you to come visit, maybe we can discuss over a cup of tea.

No
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Stephen
Irrelevant be thy name.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Outplayz
i've been saying that ever since the censoring began.   
You admit to not knowing anything about the situation and then you justify the psycopath with this level of gross stupidity. What fukin' censoring and when did it begin? Are you 30,000yrs old. There is a level of stupid in right wing views that would be rejected by a brain damaged garden slug.

disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Stephen
You missed this
And the murdering rapists in every other country? What's their excuse?


Stephen
Stephen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,323
3
2
2
Stephen's avatar
Stephen
3
2
2
-->
@disgusted
Irrelevant be thy name.

And there was me thinking that you would be pleased that you were right for once.





disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Stephen
Oh I'm always right, it's your inability to understand what I'm saying is what lets you down.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@disgusted
I don't know your age, but you must not use too many social platforms. Do you also have a presence on Youtube, Twitter, Instagram, Parascope, Facebook, etc.? If you don't, you have no clue what you are talking about... bc censorship of content is a big issue right now. My knowledge of this incident has nothing to do with that fact.  
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,040
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
I disagree. As long as you use proper NPC code using approved words like racist, white, and male and avoiding words like muslim, women, and socialism, you won't notice any problem with account restrictions or bans.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Greyparrot
Lol, yeah... just be a gentlemen and call a person an "it" if that's how "they" feel... and you won't get banned. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,040
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
Ministry of truth exists.


And of course it's from the Socialist left wingnut whackos. Just like Orwell predicted.


Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Greyparrot
I was born in 1984... but i still haven't read that book. Considering how so many people are saying it's coming true... i really think i should read it now. And yeah... the far left is really scaring me right now. So is extreme right people, but not as much as the extreme left. They are saying/doing some crazy stuff. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,040
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
Also CNN was predicted by Orwell.

TDS allows the state to control the voters with no accountability.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,040
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
Far right people don't believe in authoritarianism. Not a single one of them wants to rewrite the constitution to allow the government to grow uncontrollably. And the ones that do have zero influence on the right, who are sworn to the constitution defending the people from the tyranny of government.

Socialism requires authoritarianism, as productive people won't voluntarily hand over their paycheck to less productive people. There's no Socialist country in history that ever existed without an authoritative tyrannical government.

1984 shows what a dystopian world would be like if the constitution was shredded and people in power were allowed to program the minds of the public. The left's war against the 1st amendment with "hate speech" laws is just the critical 1st step toward this dystopia.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Greyparrot
1984 shows what a dystopian world would be like if the constitution was shredded and people in power were allowed to program the minds of the public. The left's war against the 1st amendment with "hate speech" laws is just the critical 1st step toward this dystopia.
Wow, that sounds really interesting i should read it. And yeah, i think in recent times with technology and easy access to each other, the government is getting scared. People will continue to have more and more distrust and eventually anger towards them. So, i think they are secretly up to something to gain their power back. Bc once you've tasted power... you're not going to give it up. Humans are crappy that way. So, they have to be up to something. The scary part is that something usually involves the people begging the government for help... and in any scenario we are forced to beg the government for help... whatever that scenario is can't be good. 

Off the top of my head, the only thing i agree with on the left 'fully' is the case of income inequality. For the reasons above. If one human can get more and more power... they don't care how they gain it. As long as you're on your feet, even if that is a struggle... you're still good. I don't believe that. I think the powerful need to be checked one way or another. The thing America stands for is freedom. What gives you freedom? Money. I'm not saying everyone should be rich, but everyone should feel free if they are trying. "Trying" is also important, bc i don't believe in free hand outs. But something needs to be done. And the rights, work hard and you'll make it isn't the right answer, nor is the lefts give everyone money... so i don't know. 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,040
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
Income inequality is an essential component to a society that promotes equal opportunity, as some people have more genetic talent, or simply choose to be hyper productive in society, which is the backbone of the progress of any society. These people need to have the freedom to earn more than others. 

Making a welfare safety net for the handicapped people who cannot be as productive due to bad DNA is important, but not if it destroys the income inequality that guarantees equal opportunity. The welfare net should also not be exploited by lazy people.
Outplayz
Outplayz's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,193
3
3
5
Outplayz's avatar
Outplayz
3
3
5
-->
@Greyparrot
Income inequality is an essential component to a society that promotes equal opportunity, as some people have more genetic talent, or simply choose to be hyper productive in society, which is the backbone of the progress of any society. These people need to have the freedom to earn more than others. 

So, we are going off survival of the fittest? Is that how we should still be? Bc it's pretty primitive. This world is favoring the alpha, the obsessed, and honestly, scary people fall under that too like narcissistic people, psychopaths, etc. That is who the world is favoring. The rest be damned. You were born an introvert so you get what you get... being alone and broke. A good way for you to understand my politic beliefs, always ask what would a hero do? I'm a hero at heart, or try to be. I don't agree with anything that leaves people out bc they are who they are. We all came to America bc it's suppose to be the home of the free. We need to work to get it back to that. 

Making a welfare safety net for the handicapped people who cannot be as productive due to bad DNA is important, but not if it destroys the income inequality that guarantees equal opportunity. The welfare net should also not be exploited by lazy people.
This is kinda to your top point too, but i am not against people getting rich. Actually, i want doctors to be rich, i want people that give me entertainment to be rich, music, entrepreneurs, etc. If you are giving to this world in a significant way... crap, buy an island with our money for all i care. But, supporting other people that can't be those things is also a must. We can't let those that we are willingly allowing to be rich and powerful (bc they wouldn't be if it wasn't for us) go unabated. They are human too and prone to all of our darkness. The way i look at it right now is that they are stealing from us. They are being too greedy, they are too power hungry, etc., bc they're human in the end of the day. That shouldn't be left unchecked. 

Now defining who "they" are is important, and figuring out a way that doesn't harm their success as you said is also important. Is higher taxes on them a way? Maybe, but who controls where that money goes? Plus, since i see them stealing from us currently, i don't see taxes as stealing from them. Taxes steal from all of us to put back into our nation... they should just suck it up, they'll still be rich. In this way, currently... i can't think of anything else. I'm going to be gone for the rest of the day... but if you have another idea how we can check this, i'd be interested in learning about it. Bc i currently agree with liberals on this point. Taxes would be the "fastest" way to get this started.
Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 468
1
1
6
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
6
-->
@Yassine
Indeed, regardless of narrative, it's still all western media.
Which is heavily influenced by the Jews (https://imgur.com/a/pZYfNMC).

Well, you see, it's quite the opposite. It's not even worth discussing. When were White people demonized as a whole??
It's quite the opposite? Racial hatred of White people isn't worth discussing? Is that why we have terms such as Whiteophobia, and not Islamophobia? Is that why SJWs, who reflect the current political norm pushed by media, attack people for being Muslims, and not White?

When were White people demonised as a whole? (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/915). This is a list I compiled in a couple of hours -- it's by no means comprehensive. I'm sorry to break your racially hateful narrative of 'White people aggressors, Muslims victims'. I guess you'll have to come up with something more nuanced than 'the West bad'.

Indeed, one ends with bombing & invasions, the other ends in banning & censorship. Nuff said.
Yep. Muslims bomb the Twin Towers and underground stations. Criticising Muslims is banned throughout the world (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-12/europe-illegal-criticize-islam).

Nuff said.

No it isn't. There are immigrants all over the world. There are more Muslim immigrants in just the MINA region than in all of Europe. 10 of the top 20 net migration countries are Muslim countries, as opposed to just 6 Western countries [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_net_migration_rate#World_Bank_]. In the Gulf states, immigrants make up up to 90% the population. I live in Turkey now, immigrants make up 1/10th the population. Invasion is invasion, immigration is not invasion. That's sensationalism.
Droves of Muslims don't belong in Europe. They don't integrate, breed more than the natives and then push for Sharia -- this is covert invasion. Your slanderous terms mean nothing.

On the contrary, I understand more than you think. I understand what it is like to feel disenfranchised & humiliated & helpless, & witnessing Muslims perpetrating terrorist attacks letting their rage out. Something must've driven them to such extremes that they could not contain themselves. I'm not deflecting anything, but you are dismissing the grievances of others in the favor of yours ...
You constantly deflect onto the plight of Muslims, whenever I bring up the problems of White people. Add to that the fact that you don't think White people are demonised, and that racial hatred against Whites "isn't worth discussing", and these words of solidarity become obviously fake.

Yes, angry men are not real men. Real men are big humans, with big minds, & big hearts. The world is greater than any of us, & the universe is much greater, & God is infinitely greater. That Muslim terrorist who murdered a bunch of people crying "this is for Syrians" is a baby too. You are too caught up in this Whiteness, it's understandably confusing you. I'm saying this because I know you are a reasonable & mindful person. Let me ask you, how would you (or your compatriots) feel if your country was invaded (in the real sense) & your wealth plundered (in the real sense) & your fellow countrymen killed while others displaced...? How would you feel if your people were enslaved for centuries & persecuted & oppressed & denigrated...? You get my point. If you feel like your people have been unjustly treated, others may feel just the same way. If you have grievances, others may have as well. If you've been made into a leader of your people, would you turn to justice or vengeance? Justice.
"Too caught up in this Whiteness" lol. Being racially impartial is what got Whites into trouble in the first place. When Whites engaged in real politics (i.e. mostly racial), they got what they wanted: White spaces, more land and big empires. In fact, I might not be being caught up in Whiteness enough...

I'm not sure what you're referring to by the latter part of your comment, or even what your point is.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,040
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Outplayz
It's not survival of the fittest if you have safety nets for people with crappy DNA.

If you don't have income inequality, people won't be free to choose to be more productive and more competitive than others. They also won't be free to use their superior DNA to better society for all of us either.

Someone who works harder or chooses to be more productive than you shouldn't be mislabeled as greedy.

Everyone is greedy to a certain extent, whether they choose to work hard or not. These two concepts are not related at all. The issue is whether we allow a society that rewards hard work and hyper productive people that work 16 hours a day with 150 IQ or we have a society that punishes those people by enforcing income equality. 

The best policy for a thriving society is to have both incentives for people with superior DNA as well as a safety net for people with inferior DNA.
That means you must be willing to live in a world of income inequality as well as a codified tolerance for people with different levels of talent and ability. Anything less than that means you support some level of eugenics where the genetic extemes are culled or ostracized simply to achieve equal outcomes.
Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 468
1
1
6
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
6
-->
@Yassine
In the West they don't yes. They worked in a lot of other places pretty well, such as in the Middle East, or the Indian subcontinent. If each community is left with its own territory & laws & religion & customs, where is the harm? Of course there is a chance that tension may arise, but that happens regardless.
You're right. Palestine and Israel get along just fine. India and Pakistan are the best of buddies. Where is the harm?

I don't think you actually read the stuff, areas described as no-go zones by people who've never been there. Funny! The others are not in Europe.
All wrong, apart from the fact that some aren't in Europe.

I've read so much literature on this, it's cute. You might wanna read up more on this subject, probably from non-bias sources. There were indeed some good masters, but that wasn't the norm.
Ah so you engage in the authoritarian jam-down, too. Great.

You didn't make an argument here or refute anything I said. You're literally just appealing to authority (some imagined authority, mind you, because you're still too retarded to post sources to support your arguments) and hoping people won't notice. Pathetic.

If you know exactly nothing about history then yes. On the contrary Cassie, Whites were some of the most brutal & racist slavers history has ever seen. Slaves in the Islamic world & in Asia had far better conditions. But let me get this straight, you want Africans to thank you for being so kind to them for not enslaving them anymore...? Put yourself in their place & tell me with a straight face that this is a sensible thing to expect.
RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACISTRACIST RACIST RACIST (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/174).

Whites, in general, were some of the kindest slave owners. Blacks grew taller than Whites, due to better nutrition. Black slaves worked about 400 less hours per year than the average free (White) farmer. In 2015, non-slaves were able to pick cotton at about 95% of the same rate the Black slaves did. Corporal punishment data is incredibly difficult to find, which is funny because you said that Whites were "brutal" -- provide evidence, please. I have the facts here. You only have your feelings hurt (https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/slavery-in-the-united-states/).

Meanwhile, Arabs did nothing to end slavery.

Why are you turning on me now! What did I ever do to you... Jokes aside, it seems to me these problems are not White problems, but a White-fringe problems. Because the problems we been hearing from Whites these years, & still do, somehow always boil down to genitals.
Yeah, Whites not being allowed to form racial groups is "fringe". It only affects all of Whites (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/915).







Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 468
1
1
6
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
6
-->
@Outplayz
What other avenue would he have had if he was being censored? I didn't read the manifesto so i have no clue, actually pretty ignorant to this whole ordeal bc i simply don't care anymore. But you and Resurgent do have a point in pushing people underground is not a good idea. 
He could have made a petition or gone to a peaceful rally. Maybe he could have got on a talkshow and said that there are issues that White people are facing. 

I would argue... since i don't know him i'm going to speculate. If he wasn't someone, if he didn't have that narcissistic drive, etc... that's people that get into power mostly. The way he did it was the most brilliant way to get his message across. It's sad really... the world knows how to trigger our media and get attention. They are very predictable. And look, now they want to ban 'military style weapons.' Like that will save them or anyone for that matter... push a dog into the corner, it will bite... i've been saying that ever since the censoring began. 
From my limited understanding of New Zealand, they have some of the strictest gun control policies in the world. In fact, I'm pretty sure he chose New Zealand to make that point.


Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,040
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
He could have made a petition or gone to a peaceful rally. Maybe he could have got on a talkshow and said that there are issues that White people are facing. 

Is this sarcastic?
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
Not a single one of them .

And the ones that do
Well said. bwuahahahahahaha
The left's war against the 1st amendment with "hate speech" laws is just the critical 1st step toward this dystopia.
America is so far down that path it's doubtful that it can ever turn back. 1st step bwuahahahahahahahahah
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
-->
@Greyparrot
Big Brother would be proud of your indoctrination.
disgusted
disgusted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,959
2
3
3
disgusted's avatar
disgusted
2
3
3
Squawk.
Nah just stupid.
Analgesic.Spectre
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 468
1
1
6
Analgesic.Spectre's avatar
Analgesic.Spectre
1
1
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Is this sarcastic?
No. If the media, Western people and culture weren't so thoroughly dismissive of White issues (as a whole), I would have liked him to go about his protest in a peaceful way. Clearly, he didn't have the options to do that. I don't want people to die over White people being completely disenfranchised, but the deplatforming, dehumanising, slandering etc. against Whites leaves them in a very tight corner. As much as I don't want Muslims or their religion in my country, I don't want them to be killed.

Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6
Which is heavily influenced by the Jews (https://imgur.com/a/pZYfNMC). 
- Holy shiz! This is a known fact, but DAYUMN! Even Fox News still manages to be the most pro-Israel among the bunch. WT*!!! Who knows, the people running the show here might also be Jewish, like in DDO.


It's quite the opposite? Racial hatred of White people isn't worth discussing? Is that why we have terms such as Whiteophobia, and not Islamophobia? Is that why SJWs, who reflect the current political norm pushed by media, attack people for being Muslims, and not White?
- Exactly! "Whiteophobia" in a White country by who?! Other White people? SJWs who are also mostly White supposedly "attacking" other Whites? There is no "Whiteophobia" or "Blackphobia", because that's called Racism. I'm talking about deaths & bombs & invasions, & you're talking about SJWs?! What you characterize as demonization of White people is none other than White people not agreeing with your position, which is ironically demonizing other peoples... This is why I say it's not worth discussing. This is like me complaining about Islamophobia in Turkey when other Muslims don't agree with me.


When were White people demonised as a whole? (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/915). This is a list I compiled in a couple of hours -- it's by no means comprehensive.
- I don't really get it. Why don't you explain it to me then. People generally feel more comfortable with their likes. I don't agree with the equal opportunity vs equal outcome formula, or gender & racial diversity (in representative positions), but what does that have to do with "no White groups" & "White pathology"? There should be nothing wrong with being proud of your heritage -for just cause, you have no identity if you aren't.  But unfortunately the designation 'White pride' has been highjacked by neo-Nazi KKKs to incite racism, as opposed to celebrate White heritage. So this is just a meaningless game of labels, there is plenty of occasions & ways & groups & holidays & festivals in which White can celebrate their heritage & history. If I hold an ISIS flag & call it 'Islamic pride', no one is gunna take too kindly to that. In fact, it is White people themselves who destroyed much of their culture & history & heritage, & replaced it by a whole lot of emptiness & soullessness. If Whites truly care about their heritage, they should revive it, & celebrate it in its full glory. Shouting "White pride" isn't it. The Chivalry, the Mores, the poetry, the faith, the Honor, the faithfulness. God...


I'm sorry to break your racially hateful narrative of 'White people aggressors, Muslims victims'. I guess you'll have to come up with something more nuanced than 'the West bad'.
- I never said either things. First, the narrative West vs. Muslims in the context in which it is brought up (invasion & oppression) is evidently not "racially hateful" - this feeling shared not only by Muslims in all their nations, but by virtually all peoples of the World, from China to South Africa. For a reason. Second, West =/= White people. When I say West I evidently mean the geopolitical entity, not the people themselves, who come from all walks of life, from saints to villains. Third, when invasions & bombs & the deaths of millions are involved, it is decidedly not "racially hateful". The West has indeed inflicted a lot of suffering to a lot of peoples -& also spread a lot of good, you may not like it, but it is what it is. All feelings are fleeting, but the feeling of bearing injustice. If you can not bear injustice done to your people, how do you expect others to bear injustice done to them by your people (an even greater injustice). So, what are you gunna do?


Yep. Muslims bomb the Twin Towers and underground stations.
- Exactly! Which caused the death of many Muslims too, & America retaliated by bombing whole countries full of innocent people who had nothing to do with it. Not that this is any relevant to the point you were making.


Criticising Muslims is banned throughout the world (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-12/europe-illegal-criticize-islam).
Nuff said.
- LOL! I don't know about the story, but man, you're starting to sound like Stephen. Damn! That is clearly a false claim, & it's decidedly not the case in any European country. A good chunk of content on this very Forum is criticizing Islam, & in copious abundance in countless news outlets & all social media & mainstream media, some can't even shut up about it. That's a fact. On the other hand, many Muslims have been arrested in Europe for inciting violence or criticizing Jews... I don't know why a government official who's supposed to represent the people should get away with it over & over & over.


Yassine
Yassine's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,085
3
2
6
Yassine's avatar
Yassine
3
2
6

Droves of Muslims don't belong in Europe. They don't integrate, breed more than the natives and then push for Sharia --
- What do you mean exactly they don't integrate? & what do you mean by 'push for Sharia'? Muslims comprised at one point or another 1/4th European population for over a millennia, before they were all literally purged out of it by death or expulsion. I don't know if history is gunna repeat itself, but "belong" is a matter of perspective. There aren't that many Muslims in the EU (2-4%), even if they breed like rabbits it'll take decades & decades to even get to 10%, which is an average number in terms of immigrant population in the world. That said, Muslims in Europe are, for the most part, citizens who grew up in Europe, so for all intents & purposes they do belong in Europe, the same way you belong in Australia, because you were born there. Had you been born in Turkey, you'd be a Turkish citizen as well.


- this is covert invasion. Your slanderous terms mean nothing.
- Slanderous terms? Alright, but invasion involves force & armies & weapons & occupation...etc. It should be something like if Indonesia decided to expand down-under & came & bombed the sh*t out of beautiful Sydney, & threw the country in complete chaos. This is quite different from non-Whites born & living there. I would understand if new settles start to take over the natives, to dominate or displace them, to the point where they actually feel invaded, like what happened with the Palestinians & the Jews. But this is faaaar from being the case.


You constantly deflect onto the plight of Muslims, whenever I bring up the problems of White people.
- On the contrary, my plight is simple: injustice is not a monopoly. White people have problems, so do other peoples, a fact which our terrorist gunmen failed to appreciate, but I'm hoping you will. Had he realized that, he would not have committed what he did. What would you characterize as the biggest problems facing White people? What do you think about Colonialism? How do you envision the future of Muslims in Europe & Australia? Would you befriend or marry a Muslim? What is it you're most proud of from your heritage?


Add to that the fact that you don't think White people are demonized, and that racial hatred against Whites "isn't worth discussing", and these words of solidarity become obviously fake.
- Yes, I don't think White people are demonized as a whole. It's -mostly- White people on other White people, namely the progressive leaning side against the far-right & similar ideology. Of course I don't agree with this, it is indeed an unfair injustice. What isn't worth discussing, as I stated, is the comparison Muslim/White which seems absurd to me, as it is. One thing I can say is that in academia & entertainment especially -a heavily progressive world- the White male heterosexual religious figure has become a somewhat of a trendy nemesis. This really hasn't got anything to do with Whites people demonized, it's simply what the Western culture at large has attained at the moment in its goal to destroy the old paradigm symbolized by this nemesis.


"Too caught up in this Whiteness" lol. Being racially impartial is what got Whites into trouble in the first place. When Whites engaged in real politics (i.e. mostly racial), they got what they wanted: White spaces, more land and big empires.
- Are you referring to Colonialism? I don't think 'Whites' have ever been racially impartial. The notion is indeed so alien to me, maybe this is a Western thing, the Romans did it too. A race driven civilization, as opposed to tribe or religion or ethnicity or even dynasty. But indeed, Europeans procured the torch of civilization, created a miracle & established empires -which crumbled shortly before them (in historical terms), for they were rooted in racism & oppression. What did last long though is the ideals & spirit they spread, of virtue & justice & knowledge & the common good. 


In fact, I might not be being caught up in Whiteness enough...
- Hahaha! That's nostalgia, I get it. But the thing is, the world has changed so much, & not in the favor of Whites. It was a glorious run, but civilizations & empires rise & fall. Probably the biggest catalyst of European decline is population, & our terrorist nutter knew it. Back then, 4 in 10 people were White. That's half the world population once you omit isolated populations. Now it's 1 in 9, & declining further in coming decades to 1 in 15 or less. Imagine when 1 in 2 people was White, the strong one can easily dominate the weak other. But with 1 in 15 people, where the others are getting stronger & stronger, it's impossible for the one to dominate the others, if any of them. Whites are becoming a rare breed, it's actually sad. I'd honestly rather have more White Europeans in the world than Blacks. Maybe now you know what you do. Didn't you wanna have a big family with lots of children? There is your answer.