What exactly was being defended against?
How is that anything other than you don't give a shit.
I don't have access to classified information but the claim I thought was they were planning an imminent attack on U.S. citizens and or the embassy.
hope this helpssad...
The government has proven on many occasions that it likes to lie about stuff, especially to justify the use of violence.There is no reason to take their word for it.
Oh yes, I can definitely see that you care deeply about these atrocities
“General Suleimani was actively developing plans to attack American diplomats and service members in Iraq and throughout the region,” the Pentagon said in a statement
In killing General Suleimani, Mr. Trump took an action that Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had rejected,
As rocket attacks against U.S. bases in Iraq intensified over the last two months, the president had granted the Pentagon extraordinary latitude
right, there is no reason to take their word for it unless it's something you want, you know like free stuff, entitlements, HEALTHCARE lol you are funny.
leftist love to judge others, I get that, but don't pretend that you know me or what I feel, it's irrelevant and frankly none of your business.
You have done nothing but vilify Iran this entire time with little to no criticism at all of the wanton murder and destruction being carried out by the US military. If I am wrong and you oppose that, by all means say so. But i'm guessing you won't do that because you don't care that the government is bombing muslim funerals.
Where is the evidence? Why should we carry out acts of war with no proof Iran was planning or had done anything?
vilify Iran
that's one of the problems with stuff being classified etc right?
I believe a few sources indicated he was coordinating and aiding in those attacks which would explain why he was there. He was involved with the attacks directly.
Iran could turn a corner towards peace but I don't believe the leaders want that nor do they care about their citizens. I hope I'm wrong. It could be the start of a new era.
correction, I vilify subhumans who burn people in cages, behead them, kill gays etc, don't you think people who do those things should be vilified?
Yeah, that's kind of the problem though isn't it? The government carried out an act of war without providing any justification to the american people and didn't even bother to tell congress he was doing it. I for one don't think the President should have the power to declare war unilaterally and not even bother to justify it afterwards. But maybe republicans don't care if the president becomes a king.
says who? no evidence of any kind has been presented. They could have just made it up, as countless governments have before, to justify an attack. These kinds of lies got us into Afganistan, Iraq and vietnam. They may very well get us into a war with Iran too.
How could that possibly happen when the US won't stop attacking them? They made efforts to move towards peace and Trump blew it up. They got burned when they made moves toward peace last time. They aren't going to try again without guarentees. And trump is much more interesting in bombing them than talking to them.
which people is that specifically? Some random officials or clarics? How does that have anything to do with the murder of Solemani?
I for one don't think the President should have the power to declare war unilaterally and not even bother to justify it afterwards. But maybe republicans don't care if the president becomes a king.
What makes you think american lives are so much more important than other lives?
