God's Achievements

Author: Salixes ,

Topic's posts

Read-only
Posts in total: 46
  • Salixes
    Salixes avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 494
    1
    1
    4
    Salixes avatar
    Salixes
    1) Creates Adam and Eve

    2) Creates evil

    3) Populates the world through incest

    4) Surprised that evil exists

    5) Clueless about how to deal with evil

    6) Drowns the whole world except one family

    7) Populates the world through incest.....again

    8) Surprised that evil exists......again

    9) Sends diseases, starvation, plagues, tsunamis, you name it

    10) Still bewildered at the existence of evil

    11) Blames the devil......that he created

    12) Rapes a virgin married woman so that she can give birth to himself as his own son so we can torture and kill him/his son so that he can forgive us for being so evil

    13) Says, "just joking" three days later and brings his son back to life, coz he is lonely.

    14) Claims omniscience and omnipotence

    15) Expects to be worshiped for his wisdom

    Yup, He sure is worthy of the praise, isn't He?

  • Dynasty
    Dynasty avatar
    Debates: 11
    Forum posts: 200
    0
    1
    7
    Dynasty avatar
    Dynasty
    --> @Salixes
    God didn't rape Mary. Also, he didn't create evil.
  • Salixes
    Salixes avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 494
    1
    1
    4
    Salixes avatar
    Salixes
    --> @Dynasty
    God didn't rape Mary. Also, he didn't create evil.

    For once you have made a statement that makes sense and is correct.
    But, once again, your lack of explanation or reasoning has left you wide open to be proven once again (if not sheer lazy and arrogant) to be labelled as being very stupid.
    In fact, extremely stupid.

    God didn't rape Mary alright, nor did he create evil.
    Because there is no such thing as God, nor such a person as Mary (as described in the Bible).

    And before you start jumping up and down at the prospect of roasting me for making the statements "creates evil" and "rapes a virgin married woman", everyone of the quotes in the thread are sarcastically parodying Christian belief.

    Are you at least going to make an effort to try and overcome your stupidity?

    I mean, come on, this is getting ridiculous.
  • Dynasty
    Dynasty avatar
    Debates: 11
    Forum posts: 200
    0
    1
    7
    Dynasty avatar
    Dynasty
    --> @Salixes
    You really are that sad. Also, provide evidence for the claim that there is no such thing as God.
  • Salixes
    Salixes avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 494
    1
    1
    4
    Salixes avatar
    Salixes
    --> @Dynasty
    provide evidence for the claim that there is no such thing as God.
    Yep, no problem at all.

    As soon as you provide evidence as to why you are not stupid.
  • Dynasty
    Dynasty avatar
    Debates: 11
    Forum posts: 200
    0
    1
    7
    Dynasty avatar
    Dynasty
    --> @Salixes
    Shifting The burden of proof, are we?
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 5,274
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    --> @Dynasty
    Trying to shift the burden of stupidity too.

    Lol.

  • Salixes
    Salixes avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 494
    1
    1
    4
    Salixes avatar
    Salixes
    Shifting The burden of proof, are we?
    No, just me.

    What is your point anyway?

    Oh, no....I just remembered, you never make points.

    The only point you have is on the end of the prod you use for poking holes in statements made by others who actually have the guts to stand up and say something.
  • Ragnar
    Ragnar avatar
    Debates: 34
    Forum posts: 1,785
    5
    8
    10
    Ragnar avatar
    Ragnar
    --> @Salixes
    ***
    You started a topic designed to provoke, and then respond to concise half line disagreement of your interpretation with five paragraph rant rife with insults.

    You have access to the CoC, the special warning at the top of this forum, and similarly the etiquette guide also at the top of this forum. All the tools to behave civilly when discussing/debating/trolling religion are there for you to use.

    Simply put, behave or we'll more directly help you behave.
    -Ragnar, DM
    ***
  • Ragnar
    Ragnar avatar
    Debates: 34
    Forum posts: 1,785
    5
    8
    10
    Ragnar avatar
    Ragnar
    --> @Salixes
    ***
    Your behavior has crossed the line too many times. Fighting Words are banned within the CoC, and you seem incapable of starting topics as more than that. Accusing people of having boils on their asses for which they refuse medical treatment (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/3789/post_links/162530), declaring you did not intend any honest discussion while spewing insults (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/3835/post_links/162682), and various other infractions.

    Given the previous hard warning, we take your continued behavior to be a request for help with your impulse control. You may no longer start threads (you may appeal this after one month).
    -Ragnar, DM
    ***
  • Seth
    Seth avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 114
    0
    1
    1
    Seth avatar
    Seth
    God's Achievements
    I saw this and thought WOW. Somebody got some o' that?
    I be amazed. Bring it baby.

  • Salixes
    Salixes avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 494
    1
    1
    4
    Salixes avatar
    Salixes
    --> @Seth
    It just goes to show the bias and rashness of the moderator doesn't it?
    Despite what Hitler dictated above, I did not get any previous hard warning at all, no message, just a post on this thread, which I didn't read.

    But then to misinterpret:
    Accusing people of having boils on their asses for which they refuse medical treatment
    When I was in fact making an emotioned plea for people to pray for the plight of dying children, rather than their own minuscule medical problems.

    And simply making things up:

    declaring you did not intend any honest discussion while spewing insults
    I declared no such thing at all and if you look at my "insults", they are no more than replying in kind to the much stronger insults made by others directly at me in the first place. If people gratuitously sling mud just because they don't agree with your view, they should expect to get it back.

    I think there should be moderators for the moderators if that's the way they choose to single people out and talk down to them in such a condescending, offensive and biased manner.
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 5,274
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    --> @Salixes
    And all the other sites that banned you are also wrong. And virtually all the other posters, including atheists, who think your behavior is poor, are wrong.

    ...talk down to them in such a condescending, offensive and biased manner.
    You know that's you to a T right? Project much?


  • Salixes
    Salixes avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 494
    1
    1
    4
    Salixes avatar
    Salixes
    --> @ethang5
    And all the other sites that banned you are also wrong. And virtually all the other posters, including atheists, who think your behavior is poor, are wrong.

    ...talk down to them in such a condescending, offensive and biased manner.
    You know that's you to a T right? Project much?

    You have been asked a number of times to address your continual deliberate misquoting and targetted attacks on other members.

    I would prefer to argue the topic.
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 5,274
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    --> @Salixes
    You have been asked a number of times to address your continual deliberate misquoting and targetted attacks on other members.
    You've been banned for that, and are currently under restriction for that. Project much?

    I would prefer to argue the topic.
    And yet you choose to post the fake claim you use to run away from topics!

    "...declaring you did not intend any honest discussion while spewing insults"

    Who exactly do you think is fooled when you lie that you prefer to argue the topic?
  • Seth
    Seth avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 114
    0
    1
    1
    Seth avatar
    Seth
    --> @ethang5

    "...declaring you did not intend any honest discussion while spewing insults"
    This is the post that was linked to that claim:
    Talk about intellectually dishonest. You have done nothing more than nitpick the arguments of others.

    How about not being such a wimp and stop deceptively avoiding the subject.

    Anyone with half a brain can see that I blatantly and sarcastically asked the rhetorical (yes, it was rhetorical) question for anyone to supply some proof.

    And, you and I know why it is a rhetorical question, now don't we?

    Because we both know that there is absolutely no proof to submit, don't we?

    So, you stop your deceptive, slimy  dishonesty in making childish diversions.

    You know damned well what the subject is about.
    Please point out where this accusation is supported. Thanks.
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 5,274
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    --> @Seth
    Please point out where this accusation is supported. Thanks.
    What accusation?

    And who are you? Are you Salixes? You're stalking me now for him?

    If you're going to white knight ol Sal, know what's going on before you post.

    I was paraphrasing a mod. But its none of your bossiness anyway.



  • Seth
    Seth avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 114
    0
    1
    1
    Seth avatar
    Seth
    --> @ethang5
    What accusation?
    The accusation you made via proxy in post 15. Words have meaning don't you know.

    And who are you? Are you Salixes? You're stalking me now for him?
    So you don't understand how forums work, ok.

    If you're going to white knight ol Sal, know what's going on before you post.
    I can read and respond to what I read. Deal with it.

    I was paraphrasing a mod.
    You QUOTED the accusation made by a mod. I asked you to support that accusation from within the post linked as evidence by that mod. I have told the mod in another post/thread that his links don't support his accusations and you are incapable of supporting it as well.
    But its none of your bossiness anyway.
    Can you try this in English?


  • Salixes
    Salixes avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 494
    1
    1
    4
    Salixes avatar
    Salixes
    --> @Seth
    You QUOTED the accusation made by a mod. I asked you to support that accusation from within the post linked as evidence by that mod. I have told the mod in another post/thread that his links don't support his accusations and you are incapable of supporting it as well.
    But its none of your bossiness anyway.
    Can you try this in English?

    I have politely asked Ethong to moderate his extreme modifications but he has escalated the habit recently for whatever reason. It has gotten to the point whereby he simply makes things up. 

    It wouldn't be so bad if he were talking about the topics but his dialogue consists of mostly taking cheap and nasty shots at others.
  • Seth
    Seth avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 114
    0
    1
    1
    Seth avatar
    Seth
    --> @ethang5
    I'm sorry I missed this:
    You're stalking me now for him?
    Strong in this one narcissism is.
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 5,274
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    --> @Seth
    I can read and respond to what I read. Deal with it.
    I am dealing with it, but that is appearing to upset you.

    I was paraphrasing a mod.
     
    You QUOTED the accusation made by a mod.

    No. I paraphrased a judgement made by a mod. Judgment is the mods job.

    I asked you to support that accusation from within the post linked as evidence by that mod.
    And I blew you off. I don't have to justify a mod's decision to you. Who are you?

    I have told the mod in another post/thread that his links don't support his accusation
    What you missed is that he's the mod and you aren't. And further, I don't care.

    Can you try this in English?
    If a typo of a single letter can confuse you, I need say nothing else.

    Strong in this one narcissism is.
    You are the one stalking me. Disgusted was just banned, and he was stalking me just as you now are, and I just said in another thread that another stalker always seems to pop up whenever an old one is banned. And here you are! You're even looking for my old dead threads!

    This is going to be fun.
  • Seth
    Seth avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 114
    0
    1
    1
    Seth avatar
    Seth
    --> @ethang5
    Strong in this one narcissism is
  • ethang5
    ethang5 avatar
    Debates: 1
    Forum posts: 5,274
    3
    3
    6
    ethang5 avatar
    ethang5
    --> @Seth
    Lol. It usually takes a month before my stalkers start repeat spamming. You're there already. Weak.

    As I told you Cletus, insults and silliness will not help you. I can outlast, and outwit you. Simmer down, and you'll be fine. But if all you have is anger and vitriol, I will toss you like a kitten. And I can do so for as long as you let me.

    You may not know me well yet, but I like jerks and trolls. I'm strange that way.


  • Iced_Vovo
    Iced_Vovo avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 5
    0
    0
    0
    Iced_Vovo avatar
    Iced_Vovo
    --> @Dynasty
    God didn't rape Mary. Also, he didn't create evil.
    If God didn't rape Mary then what did actually happen?
    Did Mary have consensual sex with God, thereby committing adultery, before even consummating her marriage?

    Is God not responsible for creating everything, including Satin and thereby evil?
  • EtrnlVw
    EtrnlVw avatar
    Debates: 0
    Forum posts: 2,484
    3
    3
    4
    EtrnlVw avatar
    EtrnlVw
    --> @Iced_Vovo
    If God didn't rape Mary then what did actually happen?
    Did Mary have consensual sex with God, thereby committing adultery, before even consummating her marriage?

    I don't know why immature people always translate the birth of Jesus as rape by God, isn't that a bit dumb? the point behind the virgin birth is that there was never any sex involved I mean come on grow up. If that scenario is at all true God does not have sexual organs to begin with, the womb was miraculously conceived. In other words no sex, think a bit harder for God's sake. 

    Is God not responsible for creating everything, including Satin and thereby evil?

    Yep, but there is a co-responsibility at play. One is for creating beings to become what they desire, and two is for a being to choose to become what it desires.